The future of education really isn’t that far away, especially when you consider that it is being shaped right now through the ideas, innovations, and voices of all of us. That’s why WCET wanted to be a part of an outstanding event held last week, the 100 Year Ed Tech Project’s 2025 Design Summit. This year’s Summit, held at the University of Texas at San Antonio (UTSA) and sponsored by WCET, brought together educators, students, and thought leaders.

In today’s post, Dr. Angela Gunder joins us to share key takeaways from the Summit, highlighting the power of student-led innovation, the impact of collaborative scenario design, and the essential role of organizations like WCET in fostering events and conversations just like this one. Thank you, Angela, for these excellent reflections. Make sure to check out the webpage for the 100 Year Ed Tech Project at the end of the post!

Enjoy the read,
Lindsey Downs, WCET

Six individuals on a stage with a projector screen behind them that reads "100 year EdTech project design summit" and "scenario 8 Beyond Borders."
Members of the “Beyond Borders: The Rise of Knowledge Economies” scenario share the outputs of their design work with the summit attendees.

In an ever-evolving world marked by rapid technological advancement and shifting societal needs, how do we ensure that education remains a transformative force for good?

What is the value of gathering to reimagine the future of education 50 years from now?

At the heart of these questions lies a collective desire to envision a future where education is vibrant, inclusive, and driven by innovation. The 100 Year Ed Tech Project’s 2025 Design Summit, held at the University of Texas at San Antonio (UTSA) and sponsored by WCET, was conceived as a space to grapple with these questions and to collectively design actionable solutions.

A Bold Format for Collective Imagination

As a leading authority in digital learning policy, practice, and advocacy, WCET has long championed the development of thoughtful, evidence-based strategies for integrating technology into educational contexts. In my dual role as a co-organizer of the Summit as well as an event participant from a WCET member institution, I was particularly thrilled to have WCET as a partner for this. Their involvement signaled a commitment to bold, future-focused conversations. It reinforced the importance of bringing diverse voices to the table, aligning seamlessly with their vision for advancing the effective use of technology in higher education to expand access and opportunity for all learners.

Three professionally dressed individuals stand in front of a sign that reads "100 Year EdTech Project Design Summit"
Members of the core planning team, Melissa Vito, Angela Gunder, and Samantha Becker, gather for a photo in between the design sessions.

The Summit itself was an evolution of ideas and aspirations, rooted in the vision of Lev Gonick, CIO at Arizona State University, and further shaped by Samantha Becker, CEO of SAB Consulting, Joe Lambert, Founder and Co-Executive Director of Story Center, and Ruben Puentedura, Founder and President of Hippasus. Their foundational work, which emphasized storytelling and narrative as powerful tools for educational transformation, inspired the core ethos of the 100 Year Ed Tech Project.

The event was designed not only to look forward—envisioning education fifty years into the future—but also to reflect on the lessons of the past fifty years, identifying successes, failures, and opportunities for growth.

Opening Space for a Plurality of Voices

One of the most powerful aspects of the Summit was the intentional inclusion of students as equal participants in all opportunities at the event. In a landscape where student voices are often tokenized, the 100 Year Ed Tech Project defied convention by embedding students at the heart of the discourse. Student-led academic innovation has become a hallmark at UTSA, under the visionary leadership of Melissa Vito, VP of Academic Innovation. In particular, the context of AI strategy. Having so many students from UTSA, ASU, and other institutions not only present but actively contributing to the design sprints allowed us to ground our visionary work in real-world perspectives, embodying the principle that the future of education must be co-created with those it seeks to serve.

A powerful remix of the previous year’s Summit was our commitment to democratizing the design of the future scenarios used to plan the next 50 years of ed tech. Rather than relying solely on organizers to draft future scenarios, we issued an open call for ideas from educators around the globe. This call was met with enthusiasm, resulting in a diverse array of scenarios that represented a wide spectrum of challenges and aspirations. The community voted on the most compelling ideas, and those selected became the focal points for the Summit’s collaborative design sprints. This approach not only democratized participation but also ensured that the ideas we explored were timely, relevant, and grounded in the lived experiences of educators from various contexts.

Four individuals discussing in a group,with several additional groups throughout a theater style room.
Participants at the event take part in a Futures Literacies Storytelling activity led by Ruben Puentedura.

Setting the Course for the Future

The Summit’s tangible outcomes include blueprints for the future—strategic design solutions ranging from policy recommendations to creative integration strategies. These outputs are not static documents but living resources, intended to be adapted and implemented within diverse educational contexts. Moving forward, we plan to continue the conversation through online forums and future events, nurturing the ideas and partnerships that emerged from the Summit.

Photo of a large room full of round tables with several people sitting at each table
Educators gather to design for a positive future of AI in the scenario “Automate to Elevate: AI as a Creative Muse.”

As a member of the WCET community, their sponsorship was instrumental in fostering this spirit of inclusion and innovation. WCET’s presence, particularly through the participation of Van Davis, Executive Director, and Megan Raymond, Senior Director of Memberships and Programs, brought critical insights into the evolving landscape of AI in education. Their commitment to policy and practice provided a crucial lens through which we could evaluate our collective aspirations, ensuring that our conversations were not only visionary but also grounded in the practical realities of higher education.

For those new to the 100 Year Ed Tech Project or convenings like this one that WCET frequently sponsors for its members, I encourage you to take a chance on thinking big and boldly. Share your dreams and find collaborators who resonate with your vision. Together, we can reimagine education, building a future that is both aspirational and grounded in community-driven innovation.

To learn more about the 100 Year Ed Tech Project and how to get involved, visit the project website at https://100yearedtechproject.org/.


This post was written by Dr. Angela Gunder, CEO and Founder of Opened Culture, and Learning Experience Design Specialist at The University of Arizona, a WCET member institution. She wrote this post with some help from ChatGPT with pre-writing ideation.

Angela Gunder

CEO and Founder, Opened Culture

Subscribe

Enter your email address to subscribe to this blog and receive notifications of new posts by email.

Join 2,578 other subscribers

Archive By Month

Blog Tags

Distance Education (350)Student Success (323)Online Learning (251)Managing Digital Learning (249)WCET (234)State Authorization (232)U.S. Department of Education (215)Regulation (213)Digital Learning (175)Technology (172)Innovation (126)Teaching (121)Collaboration/Community (114)WCET Annual Conference (106)Course Design (103)SAN (103)Access (101)Professional Development (101)Faculty (90)Cost of Instruction (90)Financial Aid (84)Legislation (83)Completion (74)Accessibility (70)Assessment (69)Instructional Design (68)Open Educational Resources (68)Accreditation (66)Professional Licensure (66)SARA (65)COVID-19 (64)Credentials (62)Competency-based Education (61)Quality (61)Data and Analytics (60)Diversity/Equity/Inclusion (59)Research (58)Reciprocity (57)WOW Award (54)Outcomes (47)Workforce/Employment (46)Negotiated Rulemaking (46)Regular and Substantive Interaction (43)Policy (43)Higher Education Act (41)Artificial Intelligence (38)Virtual/Augmented Reality (37)Title IV (36)Practice (35)Academic Integrity (34)Disaster Planning/Recovery (34)Leadership (34)State Authorization Network (33)Every Learner Everywhere (31)WCET Awards (31)Adaptive/Personalized Learning (29)IPEDS (28)Reauthorization (28)Military and Veterans (27)Survey (27)Credits (26)Disabilities (25)WCET Summit (24)MOOC (23)Retention (22)Evaluation (22)Complaint Process (21)Enrollment (21)WICHE (19)Correspondence Course (18)Physical Presence (17)System/Consortia (16)Cybersecurity (16)WCET Webcast (16)Products and Services (16)Blended/Hybrid Learning (15)Forprofit Universities (15)Member-Only (15)Digital Divide (14)Mobile Learning (14)NCOER (14)Textbooks (14)Consortia (13)Futures (12)Personalized Learning (12)Marketing (11)Privacy (11)STEM (11)Prior Learning Assessment (10)Courseware (10)Teacher Prep (10)Social Media (9)LMS (9)Rankings (9)Standards (8)Student Authentication (8)Partnership (8)Tuition and Fees (7)Readiness and Developmental Courses (7)Graduation (7)What's Next (7)International Students (6)K-12 (6)Lab Courses (6)Nursing (6)Remote Learning (6)Testing (6)Proctoring (5)Closer Conversation (5)ROI (5)DETA (5)Game-based/Gamification (5)Dual Enrollment (4)Outsourcing (4)Coding (4)Security (4)Higher Education Trends (4)Mental Health (4)Virtual Summit (4)Fall and Beyond Series (3)In a Time of Crisis (3)Net Neutrality (3)Universal Design for Learning (3)Cheating Syndicates Series (3)ChatGPT (3)Enrollment Shift (3)Minority Serving Institution (3)Nontraditional Learners (2)Student Identity Verification (2)Cross Skilling/Reskilling (2)Department of Education (2)Higher Education (2)Title IX (1)Business of Higher Education (1)OPMs (1)Third-Party Servicers (1)microcredentials (1)equity (1)Community College (1)Formerly Incarcerated Students (1)Global (1)Compliance (1)Cost & Price (1)experts (1)Digital Learning Operations (1)Student Voice (1)