AACSB International Business School Accreditation, New Standards, and Distance Ed

Published by: WCET | 8/29/2012

Tags: Accreditation, Standards

Today Frontiers is pleased to welcome Jerry Trapnell, Ph.D. of the Association to Advance Collegiate Schools of Business International as our guest blogger. Dr. Trapnell shares with us here the process of AACSB’s review and update of its accreditation standards and processes and how these play into distance higher education.

AACSB International (The Association to Advance Collegiate Schools of Business) is currently involved in a multi-year review and update of its accreditation standards and processes. Founded in 1916, AACSB is the oldest professional, specialized accreditation body for university based business schools in the world.  To date, the organization has accredited 655 institutions (less than 5% of the world’s institutions that offer business degrees) in 44 countries and territories.  The current AACSB accreditation standards were adopted in 2003 and have evolved since then. But, the dynamic environment of management education globally, the impact of technology in the higher education space, growing demands for increased accountability, the increased focus on sustainable development, globalization of the educational experience, and the effects of the global financial crisis demanded a much more intensive review process which is expected to conclude with the adoption of new standards and processes in April 2013.

In its current standards review and update project, distance education and/or technology supported learning in all forms have received considerable

Jerry Trapnell
Dr. Jerry Trapnell

attention and consideration of how they should be addressed in any revised accreditation standards. Through a Distance/Online Education Task Force, recommendations on how the revised standard should address this important area have emerged. Though, the final revised standards are still in development and will require extensive review and analysis by all AACSB accredited schools, the following outlines the current thinking on distance/online educational programming and how the revised standards may address this important trend.

  •  Based on the difficulty trying to prepare a unique standard that applies to all forms of distance education/technological supported learning, it is not likely AACSB’s new standards will have specific, dedicated standards on this mode of delivery. The current thinking is that broader standards on curricula management, curricula content, infrastructure, faculty and professional staff sufficiency, qualifications, and training, and student learning assessment can incorporate accreditation expectations for all delivery modes including distance education/technology supported learning.
  • Some qualitative dimensions, attributes, and guidelines related to all modes of delivery will likely be identified and be appropriately linked to distance/technology supported learning.  These include:
    • Alignment with mission, expected outcomes, and strategies (i.e., does distance delivery align with the business school mission, etc. , are resources appropriate to support the mode of delivery, are students admitted to such programs aligned with mission, etc. and are oversight processes in place to ensure quality outcomes and continuous improvement?).
    • Are participants (students, faculty, and supporting professional staff) prepared to successfully support and participate in the mode of delivery including design, evaluation, and delivery strategies that embrace engagement of students in active, interactive learning experiences)? Faculty and professional staff development is critical to ensure these individuals are well prepared to effectively direct and impact positive learning in the distance/technology driven supported context.
    • Do the program designs, structures, and pedagogy appropriately support independent learning while providing a significant level of successful student-to-student and student-to-faculty interactions including experiential learning experiences?  Are appropriate protocols in place to ensure the integrity of the learning process, student work, etc.?
    • Do the degree programs, regardless of delivery mode, have appropriate oversight, monitoring, and learning assessment/improvement policies and procedures that are effective in ensuring accountability and continuous improvement?
    • Is the technological/learning platform appropriate, reliable, and supported to achieve learning outcomes based on the desired level of distance delivery through which a program is offered? A related factor is the financial strategies supporting distance delivered programs and are such strategies appropriate and producing adequate resources to maintain and support quality going forward?

In summary, the emerging perspective on AACSB’s approach to distance delivery/technological supported learning is to view this in the context of qualitative dimensions that apply to all modes of delivery. In each accreditation review, regardless of the mode of delivery, business schools must demonstrate the qualitative dimensions of each degree programs meet the spirit and intent of the accreditation standards.

Post Author:

Jerry Trapnell, PhD.

Executive Vice President

Chief Accreditation Officer

AACSB International

1 reply on “AACSB International Business School Accreditation, New Standards, and Distance Ed”

Reblogged this on macmba and commented:
Looks like change is in the air for the hundreds of MBA programs out there preparing for online learning. This article outlines the AACSB details:

Comments are closed.


Enter your email address to subscribe to this blog and receive notifications of new posts by email.

Join 2,424 other subscribers

Archive By Month

Blog Tags

Distance Education (320)Student Success (300)Online Learning (231)Managing Digital Learning (224)State Authorization (219)WCET (215)U.S. Department of Education (209)Regulation (201)Technology (169)Digital Learning (151)Innovation (125)Teaching (121)Collaboration/Community (114)WCET Annual Meeting (105)Course Design (103)Access (99)Professional Development (98)SAN (92)Faculty (89)Cost of Instruction (88)Financial Aid (84)Legislation (83)Completion (74)Assessment (69)Instructional Design (68)Open Educational Resources (66)Accreditation (65)COVID-19 (64)SARA (64)Accessibility (63)Professional Licensure (63)Credentials (62)Competency-based Education (61)Quality (61)Data and Analytics (60)Diversity/Equity/Inclusion (59)Research (58)Reciprocity (57)WOW Award (51)Outcomes (47)Workforce/Employment (46)Regular and Substantive Interaction (43)Negotiated Rulemaking (42)Policy (42)Higher Education Act (41)Virtual/Augmented Reality (37)Title IV (36)Practice (35)Academic Integrity (34)Disaster Planning/Recovery (34)Leadership (34)Artificial Intelligence (32)Every Learner Everywhere (30)WCET Awards (30)State Authorization Network (29)IPEDS (28)Adaptive/Personalized Learning (28)Reauthorization (28)Military and Veterans (27)Survey (27)Credits (26)Disabilities (25)MOOC (23)WCET Summit (23)Evaluation (22)Complaint Process (21)Retention (21)Enrollment (21)Correspondence Course (18)Physical Presence (17)WICHE (17)Cybersecurity (16)Products and Services (16)Forprofit Universities (15)Member-Only (15)WCET Webcast (15)Blended/Hybrid Learning (14)System/Consortia (14)Digital Divide (14)NCOER (14)Textbooks (14)Mobile Learning (13)Consortia (13)Personalized Learning (12)Futures (11)Marketing (11)Privacy (11)STEM (11)Prior Learning Assessment (10)Courseware (10)Teacher Prep (10)Social Media (9)LMS (9)Rankings (9)Standards (8)Student Authentication (8)Partnership (8)Tuition and Fees (7)Readiness and Developmental Courses (7)What's Next (7)International Students (6)K-12 (6)Lab Courses (6)Nursing (6)Remote Learning (6)Testing (6)Graduation (6)Proctoring (5)Closer Conversation (5)ROI (5)DETA (5)Game-based/Gamification (5)Dual Enrollment (4)Outsourcing (4)Coding (4)Security (4)Higher Education Trends (4)Mental Health (4)Fall and Beyond Series (3)In a Time of Crisis (3)Net Neutrality (3)Universal Design for Learning (3)Cheating Syndicates Series (3)ChatGPT (3)Enrollment Shift (3)Nontraditional Learners (2)Student Identity Verification (2)Cross Skilling/Reskilling (2)Virtual Summit (2)Higher Education (2)Title IX (1)Business of Higher Education (1)OPMs (1)Department of Education (1)Third-Party Servicers (1)microcredentials (1)Minority Serving Institution (1)equity (1)Community College (1)