Categories
Practice

Online Learning: Let Students Learn Where They Are

The COVID-19 pandemic forced colleges and universities to move their face-to-face courses to remote and online formats. Instructors heroically worked to ensure continuity of learning for their students. Considering this shift online, Anna Porcaro, the Executive Director of Online Learning at Wichita State University and WCET Steering Committee member, reflected that learning isn’t all about where it takes place. She shares these thoughts with us today.

Thank you to Anna for this thought provoking post on learning experiences.

Enjoy the read and stay healthy!

Lindsey Downs, WCET


a grey stone garden wall
Image by Schmidsi from Pixabay

For over two decades, we have created a walled garden for online learning. K-12 and higher education have operated online learning as a separate entity from their “regular” in-person learning.

We have come at an inflection point because of the outbreak of COVID-19.

We need to stop treating online learning as an alternative to “traditional” learning. Learning is learning.

Pivoting Online – Dramatic Shift and Time to Shine

This spring, millions of K-12 and higher education students were forced into remote and online learning classrooms to complete their school year. In many cases, this made learning more difficult because educators had little time to prepare for the drastic shift, students and/or teachers didn’t have access to educational technology tools, and many lacked experience with those tools or didn’t know how to teach or learn online and/or remotely.

For those who did have the tools, skills, and experience this was their moment to shine. Hybrid courses quickly moved online, well-designed online classes kept up their original pace, and some ingenious faculty came up with effective ways to support learning at a distance, often through the simplest means. 

What this recent experience should tell us is that we all are able to work together toward a unified approach to be effective educators, regardless of the modality. We have demonstrated that education is about what students learn, not how they learn.

How Do You Learn Something New?

A woman holding a laptop
Photo by Brooke Cagle on Unsplash

When we need to learn something new, how many of us turn to a book or a video to do that? Did we learn what we wanted to learn that way? For me, the answer is yes.

Of course, not everything can be taught remotely, but then again, we all know that we don’t have to just be in-person to learn.

If we are to evolve in education (and by all accounts we must), we should embrace the best of both worlds and treat learning the same regardless of the modality.

For example, we could:

  • Put durable educational materials into a video. Corporate trainers have long learned that this is a viable way to present information consistently and broadly. I still remember sitting in a new hire training over thirty years ago watching a training on a video tape. I’ve also been to some in-person training that could certainly have been delivered via video or documentation. It would have been more effective and engaging that way.
  • Use the in-person classroom to have learners engage in a different way than they would during a lecture. Engagement ideas for in-person class time include:
    • hands on activities,
    • small group work,
    • guided learning,
    • just-in-time topic exploration,
    • and so forth.

We have known that the “flipped classroom” has proven to be more successful at helping learners meet expected outcomes and embracing this model can help us become better at what we do.

A Single Learning Experience

We need to stop thinking that there are two separate student bodies: our online program students take in-person classes, and our face-to-face students take online classes. Online and remote learning is an option, not a way of life.

How many of us have professional development programs that only in-person learners have access to? How many of us have a separate on-boarding or orientation process? Do we have the same outcomes for both? If the outcomes are the same, does it really matter whether it’s online or in person?

Instead of separate processes, one for in person and another for distance learning, we should create a single experience that can then be deployed in a variety of modalities: text, video, audio, branched learning, and in-person lesson plans. The different modalities support a range of learners who need to learn content in diverse ways. The outcome is the same: helping students to learn successfully, regardless of the modality.

Why do we, nearly two decades into teaching online, still treat online learners differently because some have the means to be in person where and when we are, while others can’t? Is a student’s ability to come to our campus really the deciding factor about who gets the most attention and resources?

Instead, we should all treat them the same: they are all there to learn from us. If they didn’t value what we had to offer them and all learning was the same, wouldn’t everyone just get it from the most convenient source for them? That is what they are doing. Unfortunately, in some cases, they aren’t getting our full attention and they are not getting the same experience, not because online learning is inferior, but because we treat it as a second stream.

It is now time to bring online into the fold. It is clearly a part of the way people learn in the twenty-first century, and COVID-19 has laid that truth bare. Maybe it’s time that we all realize that and embrace online learning for what it does well: teach when, where, and how the student needs it.


 
Categories
Practice

Professional Licensure Student Disclosures – It’s the One Month Warning, with No Time-outs Remaining

Winning Isn’t Everything, but Wanting to Win is!

– Vince Lombardi

Excitement is in the air! There’s two minutes left in the game! You have the ball with no time outs left! What are you going to do? It is up to you!

A basketball court
Photo by JC Gellidon on Unsplash

We just heard the horn for the two-minute (well…one-month) warning for the state authorization and professional licensure disclosure implementation game. We are looking July 1, 2020 straight in the face and need to develop a winning strategy. If only we had a playbook and diagram! Oh wait, we do! We have the Professional Licensure Disclosures Implementation Handbook and Flowchart provided by the WCET State Authorization Network (SAN) and author Shari Miller.

New Federal Regulations effective July 1, 2020 require that institutions that participate in Title IV financial aid programs must provide general and direct disclosures to prospective and enrolled students that participate in programs that lead to professional licensure.

Many may be saying, are you kidding?

No, I’m not kidding.

EARLY SEASON RECAP

Regular readers of WCET Frontiers are well aware of the long 10 year drama of the State Authorization regulations. Then, like when Brett Favre retired but then didn’t retire, we saw Federal regulations that were about to become effective in 2018 get delayed at the last second. Then the delayed regulations became effective due to a court ruling. Meanwhile, consensus language that included professional licensure disclosures for all modalities came from Negotiated rulemaking. The consensus language became the new regulations that were released November 1, 2019 just in the nick of time to meet the buzzer so that regulations could become effective July 1, 2020. To keep you on the edge of your seat, we are dealing with a pandemic! In many cases we see remote learning across state lines and the issue of licensing, certification, and disbursed students. What a game!

In all seriousness, new Federal regulations for Professional licensure disclosures for all modalities become effective in about a month. Despite our being asked many times, there has been no indication that the Department of Education will issue a delay. Recent flexibilities offered by the Department due to COVID-19 have not included information about disclosures.

There are currently effective Federal regulations for professional licensure disclosures for distance education programs that will be replaced with the new regulations. Institutions that participate in reciprocity through State Authorization Reciprocity Agreements (SARA) are required to provide professional licensure disclosures for their distance education courses and programs that are subject to SARA oversight. Your institution is likely already aware that professional licensure notifications are a responsibility. However, many may have questions about how to implement a strategy to provide the required notifications.

THE PLAYBOOK

Institutions need to develop a plan to research, assess, and provide professional licensure disclosures. Institutions can prepare by reviewing the implementation handbook for institutional compliance with the 2019 Federal regulations provided on the WCET/SAN Website, available for you to download. The handbook was expertly written by Shari Miller who brought her vast experience to this practical guide.

You will find bookmarked sections that direct you to the background information and motivation for providing disclosures, the specific language of the regulations, and an implementation guide that walks you step by step through a process that you may review and adjust to your institution’s needs. An implementation flowchart provides a one page visual of the steps described in the implementation guide portion of the handbook.

Because institutions need to know “why” they are providing these notifications, the handbook provides a summary of Federal regulatory obligations, state/reciprocity requirements, the student as a consumer, and the institution’s moral obligation. The handbook proceeds to the “what” to describe the relevant issues to address within the Federal regulations. These issues include the programs that require disclosures, the type of student, the type of disclosure, and that the disclosures apply to all modalities. The final section is the “how” to prepare a multi-step institutional approach for compliance that includes the following steps which you will see in the handbook contain sub-steps:

Step 1: Determine who is responsible for doing this work.

Step 2: Gather institutional data by creating a list of ALL educational programs that potentially lead to licensure (both face-to-face and distance education).

Step 3: Strategically prioritize state research.

Step 4: Compare the institutional data with state requirements.

Step 5: Disclosures. Levels of disclosures required for all programs that potentially lead to licensure regardless of modality.

KNOW THE RULES OF THE GAME

It is very important to review the regulations and requirements for yourself. The Federal regulations are found in Institutional Information under:

General Disclosures: 34 CFR 668.43(a)(5)(v)  

(the language is broken down into bullets below for the reader’s benefit)

If an educational program is:

  • Designed to meet educational requirements for a specific professional license or certification that is required for employment in an occupation, OR
  • is advertised as meeting such requirements…

Information regarding whether completion of that program would be sufficient to meet licensure requirements in a State for that occupation including:

  • A list of all States for which the institution has determined that its curriculum meets the State educational requirements for licensure or certification;
  • A list of all States for which the institution has determined that its curriculum does not meet the State educational requirements for licensure or certification; and
  • A list of all States for which the institution has not made a determination that its curriculum meets the State educational requirements for licensure or certification;

Direct Disclosures: 34 CFR 668.43(c)

(the language is summarized below for clarity)

Disclosure made directly to the student in writing which may include through email or other electronic communication.

  • For Prospective students: The institution will provide a Direct Disclosure if the determination is that the curriculum DOES NOT meet state educational requirements or has NOT MADE a DETERMINATION where the prospective student is located prior to enrollment in the program. (Note: the Preamble of the regulations indicates disclosure prior to a financial commitment)
  • For Enrolled student: The institution will provide a Direct Disclosure if there is a determination that the program curriculum does not meet the state educational requirements in a state where the student is located. The disclosure must go to the student within 14 calendar days of the institution making that determination.

Determination of location is discussed in this regulation including the enrolled student’s change of location through formal receipt of information from the student, in accordance with the institution’s procedures.

State Licensing Board Requirements

One may be asking, where do I find the state licensing board requirements? This is a challenge.

With so many professions with licensing boards in each state and territory, a compendium of all licensing board requirements for all professions is a tall order. However, there are several resources available to get you the contact information to reach the state boards.

INSTANT REPLAY – A FEW QUESTIONS ASKED OFTEN

No, simply telling students to look up the requirements themselves does not meet the compliance requirements.

Football on a field
Photo by Dave Adamson on Unsplash

The institution must make a conscious decision about how it will address the notifications within the direction of the regulation. An institution should keep in mind that a student who is new to the profession will have no way of ascertaining that an institution’s curriculum meets a state’s standards as compared to subject matter experts at the institutions. Even if the student could, the regulation says that the institution must address whether they have made a determination of the curriculum meeting state educational requirements, and if a determination was made, sharing the outcome. The preamble of the Federal Regulations indicates that the Department’s official guidance is that they expect the institution to eventually develop a systematic approach to research and assess the state licensing requirements. One should consider that students are savvy and may ultimately consider against an institution that cannot provide a determination about their curriculum meeting state requirements.

No, a national licensing exam does not exempt you from doing the research in each state and providing state-by-state guidance. While the profession may have agreed upon the licensing exam, there are problems with this strategy:

  • It is up to each state to decide whether it accepts the exam or not. For some professions, we have heard that some states use their own process even when a “national” exam exists.
  • The exam is not really the “educational requirements” of a state. Some states have additional educational expectations beyond passing the exam.

Yes, you can date-stamp a determination that you made to protect yourself. There are often changes made by state boards and you can attest as to when you made your determination. But…don’t let that date stamp get too stale.

MANY WINNING STRATEGIES

Institutions, like winning sports teams, may have different strategies to be successful with their professional licensure disclosures game plan. We offer this Handbook as for possible practices for an institution to follow and modify to the institution’s needs, to achieve and maintain compliance with professional licensure disclosures. As with other strategy building ideas we regularly share, we encourage institutions to work collaboratively with key stakeholders at the institution including General Counsel to ensure that the institution’s compliance plan meets risk analysis standards.

If you would like more information about professional licensure disclosure strategies, please review the WCET/SAN Website. Of particular interest, please review the great work of the SAN Special Interest Team for Professional Licensure resources including: articles, charts, and white paper on professional licensure compacts.

So, with two minutes left in the game, good luck! Cue the fight song!

 

Categories
Practice

Update on Federal Regulations Impacting Distance Education During the Pandemic

In Harold Ramis’ 1993 classic, Groundhog Day, Bill Murray portrays a television weatherman sent to cover Punxsutawney Phil on Groundhog Day who ends up repeating the day over and over again. At first, Murray’s character, Phil Connors, uses the time loop to his advantage—binge eating, having one night stands, committing robbery, and manipulating local residents based on his knowledge of events—but after time he starts to despair as his life stalls with no end in sight.

I suspect many of us feel a bit like Phil Connors right now—every day seems like the last as we go through a seemingly endless series of Zoom meetings, emails, and revisiting many of the same issues over and over as circumstances require us to reevaluate and revise former decisions. High on that list of issues is likely questions about federal regulations and regulatory relief in this time or remote education.photo of a groundhog

You may remember that early in the pandemic the Department of Education issued guidance that waived a number of regulations related to remote instruction and distance education. Since then, WCET has continued to provide updates around the Department’s waiver of certain distance education regulations, accreditor responses to the pandemic, accommodations related to professional licensure, implementation of the CARES Act, and a number of other issues (you can view WCET’s one page policy briefs on COVID-19 related issues on our COVID-19 policy resource page). As folks actively plan for the fall, we thought it would be helpful to provide a quick update on the distance education regulatory landscape.

Department of Education Updates

The Department of Education issued guidance around regulations impacted by the pandemic on several occasions in March and April. These included guidance on financial aid, distance education approvals, virtual visits for accreditation, and how to handle pandemic related student withdrawals. Since then, the Department has issued several other guidance documents of importance for distance education and higher education leaders.

Expansion of Original Guidance

On May 15th the Department issued updated guidance on several accreditation and financial aid issues, including:

  • Extending Distance Education Waivers. The Department waived several regulations in its April 3 guidance (such as temporary approvals to transition to distance education as a result of COVID-19 and the ability to enter into consortium agreements to help students ) and it extended those waivers to terms that begin on or between May 5 and December 31, 2020.
  • Extending Virtual Visits for Accreditation. The flexibility provided in the March 17 guidance for virtual site visits for accreditation is extended to the end of the calendar year.
  • Verification of High School (or Equivalent) Completions Status on Transcripts. New students who are unable to document completion of high school or obtain transcripts due to COVID-19 may submit a signed statement attesting to their high school status.
  • Leave of Absence. Provides flexibility for students who had to leave a program due to COVID-19 as to where in their program that they may resume training.
  • Return of Title IV Funds for Students in Online Programs. For on-campus students enrolled in a term that includes March 13 who subsequently withdrew, the institution is not required to return Title IV funds. However, institutions or programs (we think) “that did not undergo changes in educational delivery or campus operations as a result of a COVID-19 emergency” must obtain a written attestation from the student that withdrew from a distance education program due to COVID-19.

Accessibility Regulations

It’s taken a while for the Department to directly address accessibility in the context of higher education, but on May 12th the Department of Education’s Office for Civil Rights (OCR) released Questions and Answers for Postsecondary Institutions Regarding the COVID-19 National Emergency. This technical assistance document addresses the Department’s expectations that institutions providing distance learning will comply with all Federal disability statutes, including Section 504 of the Rehabilitation Act of 1973 and Title II of the Americans with Disabilities Act. The documents states that:

“institutions must make decisions that take into consideration the health, safety, and well-being of all their students and staff, and should take reasonable steps to address the needs of students with disabilities.”

The document also addresses the use of captioning services in lieu of sign language interpreters and OCR’s expectation that:

“If an institution can establish that providing a particular aid or service would result in a fundamental alteration or undue burden, the institution would still be required to take other steps-steps that would not result in such an alteration or such burdens-but which would nevertheless ensure that, to the maximum extent possible, the individual with a disability can participate in, and receive the benefits or services provided by, the institution’s education program or activity.”

The CARES Act

Congress passed and the president signed the Coronavirus Aid, Relief, and Economic Security (CARES) Act, a $2.2 trillion emergency aid package, on Friday, March 27th. The package contains $30.75 billion in education funding with approximately $14.45 billion of that earmarked for the Higher Education Emergency Relief Fund (HEERF). The Act outlined how that $14.5 billion should be used:

  • 90 percent goes to institutions (approximately $13 billion).
    • 75 percent (roughly $9.75 billion) distributed based on the FTE enrollment of Pell-eligible students not enrolled in fully online programs.
    • 25 percent (roughly $3.25 billion) distributed based on the FTE enrollment of non-Pell eligible students not enrolled in fully online programs.
    • At least 50 percent of institutional funds must be used to provide direct emergency financial aid grants to students to “help cover expenses related to the disruption of campus operations due to coronavirus.”
  • 10 percent (approximately $1.4 billion) divided between historically black colleges and universities and smaller institutions.
  • Approximately $3.75 billion (10 percent of the money earmarked for education) to states for discretionary education spending. These funds include a maintenance of effort requirement; however, the maintenance of effort requirement can be waived by the Secretary of Education.

WCET, as a part of the National Council for Online Education (NCOE), wrote Secretary DeVos and Congressional leaders to request that any future stimulus packages include assistance for distance education students.an infinity sympol drawn using sparklers/light

The Department has also published a FAQ related to the Higher Education Emergency Relief Fund and student emergency aid that clarifies that student emergency aid must be made directly to students and cannot be used to reimburse tuition and/or fees or the purchase of hardware or software. The guidance also explicitly states that aid can only be provided to Pell eligible students thus preventing institutions from providing federally funded assistance to DACA students (California community colleges are suing Secretary DeVos over the exclusion of DACA students). In addition to the FAQ on HEERF student emergency aid, the Department also released information on institutional HEERF Aid. Institutions can use aid:

  • To reimburse themselves for student refunds.
  • For additional emergency student aid.
  • To pay student fees associated with online delivery such as online proctoring or direct instructional services provided by a third party, including an OPM.

Institutions cannot use the new aid:

  • To pay down student balances.
  • To create new scholarships.
  • To pay salaries or bonuses of senior administrators or executives.
  • For stock buybacks, shareholder dividends, capital distributions, and/or stock options.

Finally, the Department has released information on a new grant competition to “spark student-centered, agile learning opportunities to support recovery” from the pandemic. The $300.7 million in discretionary funding will go to states and can be used for K-12 and/or higher education with $127.5 million going to Reimagining Workforce Preparation grants. These grants will assist in expanding short-term postsecondary programs and work-based learning opportunities. The Department has not yet released the full application or criteria for grants but in its Notice Inviting Applications the Department does indicate that it will prioritize states with the highest coronavirus burden. A supplemental notice with more information for applicants is forthcoming.

Other Areas of Consideration

In addition to federal actions, there are a number of other regulatory related issues that impact distance education. WCET State Authorization Network (SAN) has compiled great resources including links to institutional accreditor pandemic related guidance, programmatic accreditor pandemic related guidance, and licensure board pandemic related guidance. WICHE, WCET’s parent organization, has a number of resources. We wanted to call attention specifically to the WICHE Behavioral Health Unit COVID-19 resources, which include an informative webinar on supporting students during a pandemic, has resources regarding counseling across state lines, and also has several resources on telehealth. And the State Higher Education Executive Officers (SHEEO) has links to state higher education pandemic related guidance and information.

And Soon We Won’t Wake to “I Got You Babe”

Near the End of Groundhog Day as Murray’s character experiences a change of heart and starts to redeem himself by using his knowledge for the good of others, he opines, “When Chekhov saw the long winter, he saw a winter bleak and dark and bereft of hope. Yet we know that winter is just another cycle of life. But standing here among the people of Punxsutawney and basking in the warmth of their hearths and hearts, I couldn’t imagine a better fate than a long and lustrous winter.”

Our current crisis may seem unending, but I have no doubts that there could not be a better group of people guiding higher education forward than the distance education leaders, instructional designers, and faculty who have risen to these unprecedented challenges.

 

van davis headshot
Van Davis
Policy and Planning Consultant, WCET
vdavis@wiche.edu    @historydoc

 

 


 

CC Logo

 

Image Credits

Groundhog Image by Stefaan Van der Biest from Pixabay
Infinity Image by Mari Carmen Díaz from Pixabay

Categories
Practice

Our Reflections on a Virtual Event – the 2020 WCET Policy Summit

The WCET team enjoys planning our two live events each year. Our goal is to provide an opportunity for our community to come together to network, discuss new ideas, learn from each other, and bring important promising practices back to our organizations.

This year, in the “Age of COVID-19,” we were unable to host our annual WCET Summit as planned. As with many professional and personal events, we cancelled the live meeting. However, we decided to move the event to the virtual environment.

Hey, Let’s Just Move Online…

WCET has never held a multi-day virtual event. This was brand new territory for our team. While this is not the same as moving an entire course or program online, we definitely got a small taste of the challenges instructors and staff are going through with the pivot to remote teaching due to the COVID-19 pandemic. While we enjoyed hosting this event virtually, it was a reminder of the struggles our higher education community has gone through (and continues to face!). We salute the faculty, instructional designers, IT professionals, and staff throughout the colleges that made the spring transition happen.

Today, Russ Poulin, Megan Raymond, and Lindsey Downs share their reflections on the virtual Summit, lessons learned from hosting an online event, and ideas for delivering digital content in the future.

dates and info on the virtual policy summit, april 20-24,

Reflections on the Summit from Russ

The idea for centering the 2020 WCET Summit on policy issues was an easy one. WCET has long focused on federal, state, and accreditation policies, regulations, and rules. The 2019 negotiated rulemaking process introduced many federal regulatory changes that were coming into play in 2020, such as changes for accreditation requirements, regular and substantive interaction, state authorization, professional licensure notifications, competency-based education, student identity verification, and many more. The great partnership with the University of Maryland Global Campus put us in the DC beltway with access to those located in the Capitol.

The decision to move online was also an easy one. In talking to the leaders of other organizations, they were slowly moving to virtual options. We wanted to decide early so that we could spend our time creating a quality event.

In moving to a virtual event, we wanted you to still hear from those experts and give you a greater opportunity to ask them questions. We were very pleased to be joined by top policy leaders, including  Diane Auer Jones (U.S. Department of Education), Aaron Lacey (Thompson Coburn), Jillian Klein (Strategic Education, Inc.), David Baime (AACC), Jill Desjean (NASFAA), Janette Martinez (Excelencia in Education), and several others.

We were glad to have our members along for the ride and were very glad that more were able to join us as we moved into unexpected virtual territory.

Leading Up – The Decision and The Plan

As higher education organizations began cancelling and postponing their events, we realized the possibility of holding an in-person meeting at our partner, the University of Maryland Global Campus’ location in Largo, MD was an impossibility. Our team needed a plan that highlighted our experts, provided invaluable just-in-time higher education policy content, and engaged attendees without the face-to-face component.a notebook with a list of to do items

A viable virtual event also needed to be something that would not burden attendees and draw too much of their time and attention away from pressing matters at their institution.

Within a day of discussing with WCET and UMGC leadership the need to move the Policy Summit to a virtual event, we had a plan:

  • Move panels and sessions to a recorded format, no more than 30 minutes each to ensure that participants weren’t tied up with the Summit for an entire day or two.
  • Use our existing online community platform, MIX, to house the online event, with each key topic/panel as its own discussion thread. This platform provided online forums, member profiles, member director, and a resource library.
  • Additional resources including deep dives into each topic developed by experts were added to the MIX library.
  • The actual virtual event would consist of daily releases of two prerecorded video panels throughout each day, Monday-Thursday.
  • Each panel topic would have its own asynchronous discussions and session guides to facilitate attendee reflection.
  • The community would also facilitate networking and some fun interactive diversions like sponsor-logo bingo and prizes for engagement.
  • The final day, Friday would be used for a live virtual Q&A and conversation with the panelists and experts.
  • We created digital badges for MVPs (those who were in the top 10 for engagement), those who completed Bingo cards, and one for all attendees. These were awarded through the MIX platform.

We executed the plan which was a major team effort. Everyone had a role and we used a collaborative shared document as a timeline and task manager. It was critical to get all of the elements into one place where we could track everything that needed to be done in moving from an in-person to a virtual event, who was the lead, and when the task needed to be completed. More on how the execution went and what we learned later.

Beyond the logistics of reformulating the Summit, a few of our major considerations were:

  • Pricing- how do we avoid refunds for the price differential between live and virtual?
  • How do we communicate the value of the virtual event?
  • When do we have the event? The original dates of the Policy Summit, April 15-16 or another time?
  • Accessibility.

Pricing

On a WCET Steering Committee call, it was suggested that we invite those already registered to include two additional people from their institution to register at no additional charge. This created some extra work for our intrepid registration manager but reduced the number of refunds and increased attendance. For an in-person event we were limited to 125, for a virtual event we figured we could effectively support 150.

Communicating the Value of the Virtual Event

By April 2020, adoption of Zoom and other online meeting platforms was full-scale. People were not nearly as reticent to participate in a virtual event. The topic of higher education policy and implications is also something directly impacting the WCET community and they’ve come to lean on our organization as trusted advocates.

The audience was ready, panelists were onboard, and the topic was relevant and timely. The key was not overwhelming participants with a heavy-lift or requiring too much of their incredibly valuable and increasingly finite time and energy.

Building in additional registrations for the original price also proved to be a value-add for a virtual event.

When or Lose

Choosing when to hold the Summit was tricky.

The original dates for the in-person event were April 15-16 in Largo, MD. We knew that we needed five days to distribute the Summit content and facilitate engagement. a paper calendar on a deskSince we were recording panels ahead of the virtual event, did it make more sense to hold the event the week of April 13, the same week as the in-person Summit was planned? Or was a better option to record the panels the week that the speakers had already blocked off and would be available, and then release the videos and do the online Summit the following week? Based on our speaker’s availability we ended up doing the panel recordings via Zoom on April 15 and 16 and then running the virtual Summit the following week.

We communicated with all registrants and the WCET community that we were moving the Summit a week later. We received very few cancellations. However, people were still confused and dismayed that we had moved the dates. We learned a lesson here as well, communicate the why when making a major shift.

Accessibility

As we all know in higher education, having accessible content is critically important to serving all learners. WCET wanted to ensure that our Summit content was accessible. All of the videos included captions and the live Q&A virtual session included live captioning. The supplemental resources provided could be more accessible and easier to use with a screen reader.

What We Learned

The feedback we received from the attendees could be grouped into the following types of comments:

  • We did a great job pivoting to an online format.
    Our platform was not conducive to an online event.
  • Communication was too much- too many emails from the threaded discussions, too many messages from staff, too frequent of communication.
  • People liked the asynchronous participation, especially being able to back up sections of the videos they wanted to re-watch.
  • People missed the networking of a face-to-face event.

Example of the Summit virtual platform. Shows two example discussion posts, the welcome video from the WCET executive director, and the summit logo.
Example of the Summit virtual platform within WCET’s online community platform, wcetMIX.

Here are some additional lessons we learned:

  • Engage your audience and add some fun!
    • To do this, we encouraged questions, discussion posts, and introduction posts. We sent daily emails with something funny, we played a virtual bingo game, we awarded badges for engagement and for submitting a completed bingo card.
  • Offer a mix of synchronous and asynchronous experiences. We recorded our live session so attendees could watch later if needed.
  • Practice, as always, makes perfect
    • Ask your team members to test your online platform, have your experts practice their live sessions, practice your introductions… etc. This is very important!

Going forward, and as we do virtual events in the future, this invaluable feedback and the lessons we learned will help us craft content, curate experiences that nurture networking, and find ways to communicate that don’t overwhelm. We also realized that busy people don’t read emails thoroughly, so communicating essential information in a way people will pay attention to is vital.

As far as a virtual event platform, we were fortunate to have something in place to fit the bill but going forward we will explore better options. MIX is an excellent virtual space for our community to discuss and share resources, but it didn’t quite meet our needs for a full event space. Thankfully, one good thing about this “age of COVID-19” is that technology is improving, and new platforms are emerging.

We look forward to experimenting and hope you patiently join us on future virtual events!

 

 


CC Logo

Image Credits:

Checklist Plan Photo by Glenn Carstens-Peters on Unsplash

Categories
Practice

Fall and Beyond: Higher Education in the Age of COVID-19 and Other Disasters

Even before the COVID-19 global pandemic, higher education was struggling to make sense of what David La Piana and Melissa Mendes call a VUCA world in The Nonprofit Strategy Revolution: Real-Time Strategic Planning in a Rapid-Response World. Originally coined by the US military to describe a post-Cold War world, VUCA stands for:

  • Volatile– The world is rapidly changing and is no longer static.
  • Uncertain– The world is unpredictable.
  • Complex– The world is interwoven and interconnected.
  • Ambiguous– We no longer understand what the change levers are or even the extent to which everything is interconnected.

Or, as Mats Lindgren and Hans Bendhold in Scenario Planning: The Link Between Future and Strategy, Revised and Updated describe it, a raplex world— “a rapidly changing, complex and unpredictable environment.”

Even though institutions are well past the immediate challenges they faced in February and March as they rapidly pivoted their face-to-face offerings into remote offerings, the uncertainty and complexity of our world is undiminished. Every college and university is grappling with what the fall will look like as they struggle to balance community health with a desire to return to campus. And few, if any, are looking beyond the fall to understand the long-term impact of the pandemic on their institution and higher education in general.

fall colored leaves fall on groundA few weeks ago, WCET started a series of posts focusing on What’s Next for higher education. So far those posts have been focused on tangible concerns like lessons learned, open educational resources, professional licensure, and the use of chat bots to improve campus communications.

Over the next several weeks, we’ll also be looking at what we think the fall and beyond will look like for community colleges, public and private research universities, public regional universities, and private universities in a series we’re calling Fall and Beyond: Higher Education in the Age of COVID-19 and Other Disasters.

In this first post, we’ll take a look at the current landscape and several general scenarios while in subsequent posts delve into the likeliest scenarios for different segments of higher education.

Our Current State of Affairs

The Virus

As of the morning of May 6, 2020, The New York Times reported that more than 1.21 million Americans have been infected with the coronavirus and at least 71,000 have died. 22 states and the District of Columbia have shown recent increases in newly reported cases and 15 states and one territory show decreases in newly reported cases. New York has seen the largest number of both cases and deaths followed by New Jersey, Massachusetts, Illinois, and California. With widespread testing still lagging (there have only been a little over 7.5 million tests administered according to The Atlantic’s COVID tracking) and a lack of dependable antibody tests, both infection numbers and COVID-19 related deaths are likely to be grossly under-reported in the United States.

The lack of antibody testing is especially problematic given that both federal and state guidelines for re-opening businesses and schools hinge on both the availability of antibody tests and the assumption that those with antibodies are safe from contracting the coronavirus again. Conservative estimates indicate that the United States will need at minimum 500,000 tests per day to safely reopen until a vaccine is ready. And the most optimistic (and largely dismissed) timelines for the development and deployment of a vaccine are January 2021 at the earliest, while more realistic, but still very optimistic, timelines suggest at least 18 months before a vaccine is ready to administer.

The Economy

The U.S Department of Labor reported that as of April 30th, over 30 million Americans had applied for unemployment aid since mid-March with the unemployment rate likely to be much higher since many individuals attempting to apply have encountered state systems that are crashing and unprepared for the crush of applications. And there is every indication that when it releases unemployment figures for April, the data will reveal the worst unemployment rate since the Great Depression. Additionally, the U.S. Bureau of Economic Analysis reported that the national GDP for the first quarter of 2020 showed a 4.8% drop, the first time there has been a contraction since 2014.

metal statures of a bull and a bear in a courtyardThe resulting tension between re-opening businesses and “flattening the curve” aside, there is little evidence that even after states “re-open,” individuals will return to many businesses or even have the income to do so.

As a result, states are looking at significant drops in sales tax revenue and franchise taxes while they are paying out more in unemployment, aid to businesses, and public health costs.

The Economic Impact on Higher Education

Unsurprisingly, the economic impact on higher education will be severe. As state tax bases shrivel, appropriations for public higher education are already eroding and will likely erode even further.

The consulting firm McKinsey and Company predicts that at least 25% of public colleges and universities and at least 50% of private institutions will see at minimum a five percent budget shortfall. A minimum 25% of public IHE and 50% of private will see at least a 5% budget shortfall. Many schools are already decreasing salaries, furloughing staff, and freezing all hiring; Others have already declared financial exigency. And in March, Moody’s downgraded its outlook for higher education in 2020 from stable to negative.

Higher Education Enrollments

Further complicating planning for colleges and universities is uncertainty over fall and beyond enrollments. Although it is still too early to completely understand student experiences with and attitudes towards the rapid pivot to remote instruction, several early surveys indicate that many students are unhappy. For example, a survey of over 1200 students by educational resource company One Class found that 75.5% of respondents did not feel like they were receiving a “quality e-learning experience” since the remote learning pivot. And a Niche.com survey of over 23,000 college and graduate students showed that the majority of those surveyed found online classes less effective than face-to-face and were unlikely to consider online education in the future based on their current experiences.

There is even less certainty when considering higher education enrollments of graduating seniors. An AACU survey of college and university presidents found that 84% believe there will be a drop in enrollments for Fall 2020. The American Council on Education recently released projections suggesting that fall enrollments will be down 15%, including a 25% decrease in international student enrollments, a traditionally lucrative student population. And an Art & Science Group April 2020 poll of high school seniors planning on going to college in the fall discovered:

  • 40% had not made a deposit.
  • 12% of students who had made a deposit said they no longer planed on enrolling full-time at a 4 year school in the fall.
  • 52% have a parent/guardian who has lost a job, been laid off, or been furloughed.
  • 59% have no interest in enrolling in an online degree program, up from 49% in March.

This data mirrors a similar survey of over 7,000 college-bound seniors conducted by Eduventures in late March/early April. In that survey, Eduventures found:

  • the majority of students indicated that there was a chance they might delay entry in the fall;
  • 34 percent report loss of family income; and
  • 30 percent were concerned their college choice may change.

The result is a grim picture of a declining fall enrollment with no sense of when enrollment numbers might recover.

Fall 2020: What We Know

Despite unknown infection projections and uncertain enrollments, or perhaps because of these factors, many institutions feel it is necessary to announce plans for a return to face-to-face instruction in the fall.

An analysis of self-reported data to the Chronicle of Higher Education shows 75% of public 4-year institutions and 67% of private 4-year institutions are planning on resuming face-to-face instruction in the fall. This includes several major public university systems including North Dakota, Iowa, Alabama, the University of Texas System, Georgia, Maine, Maryland, Nebraska, and Utah.

University presidents find themselves in a bind. As Lee Gardner writes for The Chronicle of Higher Education:

 How do you decide if it will be safe to bring students back to campus for the fall when there’s no reliable prediction of what course the disease will take? Wait too long for clarity to emerge, and you’re scrambling. Act too soon and you might miss the chance—albeit perhaps a slim one—for an ordinary move-in day. What happens if the virus is contained this summer, then roars back in the fall?

Some university presidents have responded with optimistic rhetoric, such as Purdue University’s president and former Republican governor of Indiana, Mitch Daniels. Daniels recently proclaimed that Purdue is “determined not to surrender helplessly” to the virus. And went on to explain that shutting down campus “has come at extraordinary costs, as much human as economic, and at some point, clearly before next fall, those will begin to vastly outweigh the benefits of its continuance.”

Over 700 universities report that there are still slots available for their fall classes as both prospective and current students struggle to decide what they will do in the fall. Residential institutions have lost hundreds of millions of dollars as they provide refunds for room and board from the spring term while endowments are reeling from drops in the stock market. Add to the mix that residential universities are, in part, selling a college “experience” that is impossible to directly translate into a virtual environment and you see profound pressure to bring students, faculty, and staff back to campuses.

Fall 2020: The Possible Scenarios

Trying to predict what the fall term will look like right now feels a bit like trying to see through a muddy window—you can catch glimpses of shapes but not clear picture. In the next few weeks, we’ll take a look at the most likely scenarios for four different types of institutions:

  1. community and technical colleges,
  2. public and private research universities,
  3. regional and urban public universities, and
  4. small to medium sized private universities.

We’ll specifically explore:

  • Likely fall scenarios;
  • Biggest challenges and opportunities schools will face in the fall;
  • Forecast what higher education will look beyond the fall and the impact of the crisis over the next several years; and
  • What schools should be doing right now.

Until then, it’s worth touching on a few of the scenarios higher education leaders and experts may be considering. For example, Inside Higher Ed is currently publishing a series of blog posts by Edward J. Maloney and Joshua Kim exploring fifteen possible scenarios:

  • Back to normal
  • Late start
  • Moving fall to the spring
  • First-year intensive
  • Graduate students only
  • Structured gap year
  • Targeted curriculum
  • Split curriculum
  • Block plan
  • Modularity
  • Students in residence, learning virtually
  • Low-residency model
  • HyFlex model
  • Modified tutorial model
  • Fully remote

I believe that we will likely see a combination of several of these scenarios emerge as institutions craft a strategy for the fall term. How these combinations develop will differ based on several factors, but especially based upon the type of institution.

What everyone agrees will not happen is a return to “normal.” Face-to-face as we know it, for the foreseeable future, is gone. Large lecture courses with hundreds of students crammed into a lecture hall will be gone as schools struggle to adapt to social distancing in the classroom. Regardless of the size or type of school, all institutions will struggle to configure public spaces differently. For some schools this may accelerate a recent trend in building flexible spaces that can be reconfigured in a variety of ways. Libraries and computer labs will look different and be limited to smaller numbers of students. And recent reductions in faculty and staff will leave fewer people in place to make these changes and meet student needs.

Our new “normal” will mean no large gatherings on campus, including athletics and new student orientation events. Campuses will be forced to spend more of their dwindling resources on health and sanitation, decidedly “unsexy” but increasingly critical areas. More attention will be paid to how labs and other practical experiences are fulfilled. These activities will undoubtedly require greater outlays of human resources at a time when those resources are already spread too thin. Faculty and staff are exhausted from the current push and as we move into the summer, institutions will have to find ways to compensate faculty who are on nine- or ten-month contracts for professional or course development. And some institutions are already finding that faculty are balking at provisional fall plans that would increase their workload without any compensation. Fall’s “new normal” is likely to look uncertain and contentious.

Regardless of the size or type of institution, there are several things that all schools should be doing as they respond to this raplex, VUCA world.

Take a breath and look back

If you haven’t had a chance yet to write down everything you have done in the last few months (and why you did it) now is the time for reflection. What did you do, why did you do it, and what worked/what didn’t work? Who did it? What could you do better? And, perhaps most importantly, who is responsible for tracking and disseminating all these lessons learned?

Understand your real instructional needs

As you think about your course offerings for the fall and the spring, determine the minimum viable courses you need to offer for your students. Now is probably not the time to roll out new electives; this is the time to double down on your core curriculum. If there are courses that a very small number of students need that cannot be postponed until the spring, can you leverage consortia to provide those courses? You should also consider:

  • Academic and student support services needed to help students succeed in these classes,
  • Faculty supoprt to help re-design courses,
  • Faculty professional development they need to successfully offer those courses,
  • Resources to help faculty offer the courses in whatever new or modified modality you decide to use, and
  • Availability of instructional design resources to help faculty with the re-design process.

Map your existing resources to your needs and determine any gaps

Now is the time to do a careful and realistic inventory of your resources—human, economic, and technical. What sort of faculty development program do you already have in place? What instructional design capacity do you have? Are there faculty and staff with expertise that can be repurposed for your new needs? And where are your gaps? You may not be able to fill all of those gaps, but understanding where they are and which ones you should prioritize filling will be critical as you prepare for the fall and beyond.

Build realistic scenarios beyond the fall

No one has had time to be proactive over the last several months and as we all continue to play some devilish version of Whack-A-Mole finding the time, space, and wherewithal to think beyond tomorrow will continue to be hard. But we have to move beyond immediate concerns to start thinking about what our campuses and country will look like beyond fall. Although it is tempting to think about fall as the destination, we should really be thinking about it as a bridge. And that means beginning to build evidence-based scenarios for what 2021 and beyond might look like. What might enrollment numbers look like? What types of programs might you need to offer? What revenue lines are you likely to lose and/or gain? Who are your likely students?

When we seem to know so little and have control over so little, it’s human nature to want to predict the future so we have some certainty. So it’s easy right now to default to predictions and frustrating because we simply don’t have the data to make those predictions. Instead, we should consider shifting our focus from predicting the future to what Nick Montfort calls “future-making” in his 2017 book The Future. This is more than a change in semantics. As Montfort explains,

I’m calling the act of imagining a particular future and consciously trying to contribute to it future-making. This term is meant to distinguish a potentially productive perspective on the future (let’s build a better future) from a less productive one (let’s predict what will happen for instance, so we can react quickly by anticipating it).

As we collectively grapple with what the fall term looks like, we must also think about how we can use fall to build a bridge to what comes next. And if we don’t build that bridge with the “beyond” in mind, we run the risk of not liking where we’ll end up.

Next week—Fall and Beyond: Public Regional and Urban Universities

van davis headshot
Van Davis
Policy and Planning Consultant, WCET
vdavis@wiche.edu    @historydoc

 

 


 

CC Logo

 

Image Credits
Fall Leaves Photo by Autumn Mott Rodeheaver on Unsplash
Bulle und Bar Frankfurt Photo by Eva K CC BY-SA (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/2.5)

Categories
Practice

Licensing Certification and Dispersed Students, Oh My! 

Institutions have juggled many issues to maintain educational continuity during the pandemic. WCET has addressed accessibility, Veterans benefits, crisis coordination, Open Educational Resources, the U.S. Department of Education’s ability to exercise enforcement discretion for Title IV eligibility , and more!

However, we must now address the issue of institutional management of state licensing board requirements for programs leading to professional licensure or certification. There are also related issues if the activities take place outside of the state of the institution. Institutions should track the student’s location and be familiar with licensing board educational requirements in other states as well as the home state of the institution. Documentation of processes and transparency of information to students is essential.

Responding to Crisis by Pivoting Online

When institutions were forced to quickly close campuses due to the COVID-19 pandemic, students disbursed to various corners of the United States. Institutions moved swiftly to provide educational continuity to the widely disbursed students by converting face-to-face courses to an emergency remote and online format. The U.S. Department of Education quickly understood the plight of the institutions to provide instruction to students located outside of the state of the institution by offering flexibility for state authorization compliance as it relates to Title IV Federal financial aid. Although, it should be noted that the guidance indicated that it does not extend to requirements by any states which would be outside of the Department’s authority.Photo of the united states in the dark with lights showing heavy populated areas

An additional important issue is the impact on institutions and students for conversions of course modality and alternate experiential learning for programs that lead to professional licensure or certification. Students pursuing programs leading to professional licensure or certification not only were disbursed to the various corners of the United States to continue their courses online, some students found their required experiential learning opportunities cancelled.

So, in addition to managing technology, accessibility, quality, and other student focused issues, the institution must consider institutional approval in the states where the student is located and any necessary program approval for a program leading to state licensing or certification by the state licensing board in each state where students are located.

As we all look forward and consider “what’s next” it will become increasingly important to review state licensing board requirements as we move from emergency management of curriculum to the “new normal” management of curriculum for programs leading to licensing or certification.

Institutional Approval

Thank goodness it is the year 2020! …and thank you State Authorization Reciprocity Agreements (SARA) for facilitating the mechanism to provide more than 2,000 participating institutions the ability to enjoy institutional approval through reciprocity during the quick conversion to online course delivery to students who were suddenly spread to all of the 49 SARA member states, the District of Columbia, Puerto Rico, and U.S. Virgin Islands (only California has not become a SARA member state). If this pandemic had happened in 2010, each institution would be subject to the widely varying processes and fees of the individual states for institutional approval to offer online courses to the students located in those states while the students participate in those activities. California institutions and institutions choosing not to participate in SARA have found these varying processes and fees challenging.

The institutions not participating in reciprocity must follow the specific state requirements, if any, in each state where the students are located. Some states are offering an emergency institutional approval process due to the pandemic, and some are not. Additionally, SARA provides a consistent path to the appropriate state agency to review and act on student complaints that are unresolved by the institution. Thank goodness in 2020 most institutions can rely on institutional approval through SARA participation and the students can rely on a consistent path to manage student complaints due to their institution’s participation in SARA.

Program Approval

This is where it gets tricky…

Institutions that offer face-to-face programs that lead to professional licensure or certification typically prepare their students to obtain a license or certificate in the state of the institution. stamp that says approvedThe pandemic caused some students to leave the state of the institution to continue their courses remotely from a different state. Participation by the student in courses leading to professional licensure in a different state may prompt the need for the institution to gain approval of the program from the state licensing board where the student is located.

State professional licensing boards may wish to exercise authority over the institution that offers students the ability to participate in courses leading to a license or certification in their state. Oversight may include requirements for modality of instruction, types of courses, and time participating in required experiential learning. (ex. clinicals, student teaching, etc.). Institutions may need to seek programmatic approval by the state licensing board. Note that professions vary, and states vary as to educational requirements to obtain a license or certificate for different professions. Consistency of educational requirements by state boards or at least clear access to the requirements would be helpful (but, this is a conversation for another day).

Examples of collated state licensing board information for some professions:

Emergency measures by some state licensing boards for some professions and state executive orders address emergency approval for conversion to online courses, program modifications, cancelations of proficiency/licensure testing, and experiential learning opportunities to assist students to move forward in their academic programs during the pandemic. Students may be offered the opportunity to participate in virtual or simulated experiential learning or may be able to obtain a temporary or provisional license in several states. The institutions providing the programs may need to seek approvals by the state boards to provide alternative instruction. It is important for the institution to review the state licensing board requirements. Some national associations of state boards have provided compiled state board emergency responses for which we have gathered and share on the WCET/SAN website.

Disclosures

During this unprecedented time, students are adjusting to varied alternative education and training for programs leading to licensing from a wider variety of states other than the home state of the institution. Although institutions are currently in an emergency response mode, institutions will likely see a continuation of out-of-state activities for these programs in upcoming academic terms necessitating additional focus on research and disclosures regarding the professional licensure programs.

Knowledge of the various states’ requirements is quite a challenge for institutions caught unprepared in their nationwide professional licensure research for each of their institution’s programs that lead to licensure or certification. To be fair, it is a huge undertaking for the institution to research each institutional program leading to professional licensure or certification in each of the states and territories in the United States. However, research of the state requirements and subsequent disclosures of the determination of whether the institution’s curriculum meets state educational requirement is an important undertaking to serve students participating in the institution’s licensing programs. One may consider that this is also a reasonable undertaking considering that institutions have made the most of opportunities to market in other states and offer their programs in other states through distance education.

Research of state board requirements and subsequent disclosures to students is not a new institutional responsibility. For years, institutions participating in SARA have been required per SARA Manual Section 5.2 to provide professional licensure disclosures for distance education students. Federal regulations set to become effective July 1, 2020 require that institutions provide general and direct disclosures to students for their programs that lead to professional licensure or certification regardless of educational modality. These new regulations will replace currently effective Federal regulations that include professional licensure disclosures for distance education.

Transparency by the institution is critical for the student with aspirations of a career in a profession. One should consider that in this increasingly mobile society that students will desire flexibility to choose the best employment opportunity in their profession from a variety of states.Stethoscope next to a laptop The State of Emergency declarations from many states that provided flexibility to employ health care students and workers during the pandemic may also cause students to realize the value of their profession and even to be more discerning when considering the state where they will someday practice their profession. The discriminating student will look for an institution that provides clear information about the status of the curriculum meeting state educational requirements in other states. Disclosures by institutions provide students the ability to make informed decisions and understand whether the program’s educational offerings are sufficient to obtain a license or certificate to secure employment in that profession.

What’s Next

The Spring term courses were very quickly adapted for students due to the campus closures. Time has transpired for preparation of Summer term and development of possible options for Fall term. As such, the bar may be raised for course quality and compliance requirements moving forward.

Members have asked whether we anticipate that the Department will delay the effective date of the July 1, 2020 for the new Federal regulations. While the Department may extend flexibility in regard to compliance for purposes of Title IV programs, the institutions will continue to be responsible to institutional accreditors, programmatic accreditors, state licensing boards, and state higher education agencies.

We recommend the following actions:

  • Identify the institution’s programs that lead to professional licensure or certification.
  • Identify any curriculum changes that were necessary due to the COVID-19 pandemic.
  • Document any changes to curriculum including meeting didactic learning objectives and experiential learning circumstances.
  • Identify the current location of the students.
  • If the institution does not participate in SARA, the institution should review and pursue institutional approval in the states where the students are located, if required by the state.
  • Review state licensing board requirements where students are located and seek programmatic approval, if required by the state licensing board.
  • Be transparent with students including disclosures for programs leading to professional licensure.

Please continue to follow the continuously reviewed COVID-19 (Coronavirus) Updates and Resources on the WCET website. On the WCET/State Authorization Network (SAN) website you will find access to guidance from National Associations for State Licensure boards, Institutional Accreditor guidance, and Programmatic Accreditor guidance. You may wish to join SAN as we will continue to address federal state, and reciprocity compliance for the out-of-state activities of the institution. Don’t forget to engage with us through the WCETDiscuss and WCETNews, both of which can be accessed through wcetMix, WCET’s interactive community for our members!

Cheryl Dowd

 

Cheryl Dowd – Director,
WCET State Authorization Network
cdowd@wiche.edu  @dowdcm

 

 


WCET Resources on COVID-19

This is a highly dynamic situation and WCET will continue to update this post as needed. As always, we recommend that you directly contact your accreditor for specific guidance. WCET will continue to provide resources and updates related to COVID-19. Please see the WCET COVID-19 webpage which lists a number of curated resources for instruction, assessment, student services, regulatory policy, technology/infrastructure, and institutional emergency response planning.


 

CC Logo

 

 

Image Credits:

US in Lights Photo by NASA on Unsplash

 

Categories
Practice

Communicating About the Crisis – with Help from Cowboy Joe

Today’s installment of What’s Next comes from Katie Carroll, Assistant Director of Admissions from the University of Wyoming. Katie shares with us how Wyoming is using Cowboy Joe, the institution’s chatbot, to help students, faculty, and staff navigate many of the challenges resulting from the pandemic. As the need for answering questions and providing information in a timely manner increases as we near the fall term, Wyoming’s repurposing of its chatbot is especially timely. In case you missed it, Cowboy Joe was featured in the April 8, 2020 New York Times article “College is Hard. Iggy, Pounce, Cowboy Joe, and Sunny are Here to Help.”

– Van Davis, WCET


When the news of the novel coronavirus began to spread rapidly across the nation, the University of Wyoming Board of Trustees and administration sprang into action to determine how we could quickly and efficiently communicate updates and plans to students, staff, and faculty. In order to meet these communication needs, we came up with a successful (and honestly, somewhat fun) technological tool. We hope that by hearing our implementation story, you can adapt some of our practices to your own campuses’ needs.

Communicating with our Community

Within weeks of the announcement about the virus, our team of administrators and campus leadership put together an incident command center, an informational website, and a series of email communications to send out to students, staff, and faculty and campus constituents.

Of course, crises like COVID-19 don’t wait for convenient times to strike, and our communication about the pandemic began just three days before students were leaving for a week of spring break. We needed a way to keep providing important information to our community.

In order to ensure that we were reaching students and staff through the simplest, most familiar means possible, we launched a special version of the University of Wyoming’s artificial intelligence chatbot, Cowboy Joe.A pony with a cover that says Cowboy Joe University of Wyoming, posing with two women in cowboy hats

Launched in 2018, Cowboy Joe (named after our live Shetland pony mascot) was developed by the higher ed AI startup AdmitHub to help our team communicate with prospective students as they navigated the admissions and enrollment process. Research suggests that chatbots can help colleges and universities address persistent challenges like “summer melt” by communicating with students in real time and helping respond to questions, track key deadlines, and elevate issues to advisors or support staff when needed. In addition to helping us communicate, though, Cowboy Joe has become well known amongst the UW student population, so we knew he would be a great asset to help get necessary updates related to COVID-19 out to students no matter where they were.

Cowboy Joe’s Repertoire

In response to the outbreak of the virus, AdmitHub also updated Cowboy Joe’s knowledge base (the set of questions that the bot is prepared to answer) to draw on the latest WHO and CDC news about COVID-19. Cowboy Joe is available on the University of Wyoming website so students can communicate with the bot via their web browser or by text. Students admitted to the university are given a specific number so they can text Cowboy Joe directly; they can also connect with Cowboy Joe through the web chat window on many of the university web pages. In addition to a repository of coronavirus-specific questions, we were able to add our own set of answers/knowledge to the bot so students would not only receive general CDC-reviewed information, but information specifically relevant to the UW community as well.

This included information like…

  • Cancellations/Closures of specific campus events.
  • Orientation updates.
  • Contacts for our Student Emergency Fund.
  • Information on move out due to COVID-19.

Cowboy Joe to the Rescue!

Perhaps most importantly of all, working with Cowboy Joe has allowed our staff to continue to focus on helping students via email, phone, and video conferencing, all while knowing the chatbot was responding in real time to questions on the website.

A pony ith a cover that says Cowboy Joe on a foodball field
Chatbot Cowboy Joe was named in honor of Wyoming’s mascot, the Shetland pony Cowboy Joe

In the weeks since the pandemic began, we’ve also been able to work with Cowboy Joe to listen to the types of questions that students have had about COVID-19. Many of them were simple:

  • Is the campus closed?
  • Is graduation cancelled?
  • How do I prepare for online classes?

Some were more personal — which we’ve seen time and again, as students are often more comfortable sharing personal (or potentially embarrassing) questions with the chatbot than they are with staff members. In this unprecedented time, those personal questions have become perhaps even more urgent, as we saw just a few weeks ago with a student studying abroad who asked Cowboy Joe: “How am I going to get home?” Cowboy Joe not only pulled from our pre-programmed database with the appropriate contact information for the UW team, but also elevated the message to our team so we could communicate live with the student and help them navigate the complex logistics of travel in the age of coronavirus.

The Team Behind the Bot

What does it take to make a chatbot successful, particularly in times of crisis? For us, it took clear and open conversation between a broad and diverse group of campus stakeholders, including:

  • Student health professionals,
  • Marketing,
  • IT,
  • Recruitment, and
  • Campus leadership.

By aligning on a single goal (keeping students informed) and working together toward that purpose, we were able to enhance Cowboy Joe to be COVID-19 ready in a matter of weeks. Now, the chatbot is being actively used not just by UW students, but also by faculty, staff, and members of the broader community.

Lessons Learned

Two women in cowboy hats run with Cowboy Joe, the pony, on a football field In times of crisis, people want accurate and quick information – and with the help of Cowboy Joe, we have been able to provide that information to our community. As things change rapidly during the crisis, we have learned it is imperative to have Cowboy Joe’s knowledge base updated as quickly as possible; since he’s able to respond so rapidly, it’s extra important that he shares the most up-to-date information!

One thing that’s been important for us to remember throughout this process is that there’s still a lot of uncertainty. We don’t know when this unprecedented situation will end, and we’re still in the process of determining how it will affect the UW student experience in the weeks and months to come. But what we do know is that more communication among the UW community can only make things better — and thanks to Cowboy Joe, we’ve been able to keep those communication channels open despite the tumultuous changes in the world around us.

IMG_1784

 

Katie (Watson) Carroll
Assistant Director, Admissions
University of Wyoming Admissions
kcarro20@uwyo.edu

 


WCET Resources on COVID-19

This is a highly dynamic situation and WCET will continue to update this post as needed. As always, we recommend that you directly contact your accreditor for specific guidance. WCET will continue to provide resources and updates related to COVID-19. Please see the WCET COVID-19 webpage which lists a number of curated resources for instruction, assessment, student services, regulatory policy, technology/infrastructure, and institutional emergency response planning.


 

CC Logo

 

 

 

 

Categories
Practice

Promising Practices for Navigating “What’s Next”

I have long marveled at how quickly and effectively WCET pivots to support its members when we most need assistance. Remember the announcement of new guidelines that regional accreditors were going to use to evaluate distance education (CRAC-2001)? State authorization enforcement by the Department of Education? WCET helped us navigate around those icebergs.

The Coronavirus pandemic, unprecedented in its national/international impact, has forced campuses to close indefinitely, leading to the plunge into remote learning.

next

Russ Poulin’s earlier reference to the Titanic, lifeboats, and icebergs started our discussion earlier this month about not only what our members have done to enable instructional continuity this spring, but more important, what our institutions are planning to do to sustain and improve remote learning into the summer, the fall term, and beyond.

Interviews and Promising Practices

Through our interviews with online learning professionals, a number of promising practices emerged that you might find useful. The pandemic will continue to test us, but also provide all of us with opportunities to innovate and continuously improve, albeit under an immense amount of pressure.

The following is a summary of the key practices I found when interviewing these online learning professionals. Below the key practice summary, I have included a table with summarized details of all my interviews. This table includes links to the in-depth content from each interview, should you choose to review the actual interviews.

  • Integrate faculty development and support into remote learning development and/or delivery. Washington State University is awarding certificates to faculty who successfully complete more advanced virtual workshops on engaging students and authentically assessing student learning in the digital learning environment. The University of Central Florida is extending professional development previously used to prepare adjunct faculty and graduate assistants to “inherit” an online course to faculty new to remote teaching.
  • Pair inexperienced remote learning faculty with knowledgeable and experienced online faculty. This is one method of scaling support to augment instructional designer staff. Wichita State University is connecting remote learning faculty with volunteer peer faculty mentors, each of whom are an alumnus of their faculty fellows’ program. St. Petersburg College connects its “superuser” online faculty to remote learning faculty in a similar way.
  • Policies should allow and support integration of content and strategies from quality-certified online courses. This content can be used to develop course shells, creating ‘ready-to teach’ remote learning courses. St. Petersburg College has retrofitted quality online courses) and Indian River State College (master online courses) have leveraged their repositories of QM-certified online courses to push high quality content and learning strategies into remote learning shells.
  • Leverage the strength of a collaborative approach to the use of university resources. The University of Nebraska Online is allocating grants to enable the strategic and coordinated conversion of on-campus or blended courses to high quality online in time for summer delivery. Similarly, the Virginia Community College System is converting “Passport” general education transfer courses into quality online learning courses for summer term use.
  • Use LMS analytics to identify faculty and students needing targeted support. Indian River State identifies both faculty members and students that need extra attention, based on analytics data.three rotary phones on a wall
  • Deliver accurate and updated communications to all stakeholders. Students and faculty feel isolated and are starved for information. Wichita State University and Broward College are doing an especially good job at communicating with both faculty and students. Washington State significantly upgraded its “Distance Education Tool Kit.” This kit was previously used to support students and faculty during snow emergencies. The Virginia Community College System is using all available social media tools to ensure that students know that institutions are virtually open and classes available.
  • Support remote students. Wichita State supports a “one-stop” student services center for all students, online and on-campus. The front-line staff addresses 80% of student requests and questions related to student services (admissions, advising, etc.). The remaining 20% are handed off to the individual offices for support; these requests are more complicated and take more time to address. Though 90% of Washington State students have had some experience with digital learning, the bigger challenge for their students has been adjusting to disrupted jobs and lives and accomplishing all of their learning at home. The University has responded with an intensive level of personal communication, engagement, and support, include food pantries, Chromebooks to lend, and wi-fi solutions.
  • Support students with disabilities. The University of Central Florida has stepped up financial support for its Student Accessibility office to support students learning remotely who have accommodation needs. Wichita State discourages the use of live video for course delivery, and expects that accessibility is integrated into instruction, especially when faculty have students who have registered support needs.

“What’s Next?”

Imagine a day when the Coronavirus is not the first thing we think about when we wake up. Perhaps on that day, your college’s senior leaders will fully understand and appreciate the strategic and vital role that online learning plays in not only the survival of the institution, but in its future prosperity. a woman working on a laptop showing video conferencingPerhaps a substantial majority of faculty will have embraced digital learning and appreciate the relationship between professional development, quality standards, and student success. And finally, perhaps students previously hesitant to take online courses will now regard digital learning as convenient and also as a viable pathway to their career goals.

And, oh yes, digital learning infrastructure, technological and human, will have been strengthened so that the university is ready for the next crisis.

A big thank you to those brave and generous chief online learning officers that found time in their schedules to share their stories with us!

The table below summarizes a series of promising practices gleaned from interviews with online leaders. These persons represent institutions varying in enrollments and in digital learning sophistication. Select the link from the “Institutional Sources” column to see an institution’s “What’s Next” interview highlights.

WCET “What’s Next”: best practices, next steps, and lessons learned.

Institutional Sources

Face-to-face to “remote learning” course conversion on steroids.

Over spring break, the University moved nearly 5,000 face-to-face course sections, over 700 blended course sections, and 500,000 course credit hours to digital delivery. Fortunately, UCF has a very robust level of digital learning infrastructure, and faculty and student support services, to support this change.

The UCF Story

Triage faculty development at scale.

Daily, live training sessions, with learning outcomes related to D2L basics, creating tests and quizzes in the LMS, using BlackBoard Collaborate, and Respondus began mid-March and were sustained for 2+ weeks. Approximately 1,200 faculty participated in these offerings. Many of these faculty are learning these tools and tips for the first time and others are enhancing their skills. The Wichita State Story

“Remote learning” is not online learning. It is time to add structure to the “wild west.”

Going forward, BC Remote Learning Courses must be delivered using the College’s Desire2Learn (D2L) learning management system, Blackboard Collaborate, and other approved Broward College systems. Remote courses blend both synchronous (at least 21%) and asynchronous components to meet the course’s learning outcomes. Goals include requiring that all faculty teaching remote classes to satisfactorily complete training. The Broward College Story
All previous F2F learning will be online for Summer, either using a retrofitted quality online course in D2L, or live online using Zoom with some form of faculty-student communication. Faculty not inclined to go the retrofitted online route (adopting an existing online course) are given the option to deliver their previously on-campus courses using Zoom.

The St. Petersburg College Story

Moving past the emergency deployment phase, the Virtual Campus team is working with academic deans, who will assign faculty new to online learning to one of three options for summer term course delivery. Virtual campus staff will provide faculty development and support for faculty in each pathway:

  • “Master Course” — QM certified online courses will be shared with faculty new to online learning.
  • “Internet Course” with two categories:
    • ‘Legacy internet course’ — These courses, typically electives, have been previously developed and taught but have not gone through the Quality Matters design process to achieve Master Course certification.
    • ‘New online course’ – Faculty teaching these courses will be given an enhanced course shell based on the master course template.
  • “Remote Learning” Course — Faculty will use Blackboard Collaborate for real-time lecture delivery.

Indian River State College Story

Priority for conversion to certified high quality online courses.

The VA Community College System’s Office of the Teaching & Learning Technologies is converting “Passport” Transfer Courses for summer delivery. Virginia’s Passport “is a 16-credit hour community college program in which all courses are transferable and shall satisfy a lower-division general education requirement at any public institution of higher education.”

The Virginia CC Story

Leveraging the strength of a collaborative approach to the use of university resources, the University of Nebraska Online is allocating grants to enable the strategic and coordinated conversion of on-campus or blended courses to high quality online, and to scale instructional design and digital tools. Campus leadership is submitting proposals to use a portion of funds available to create online versions of high enrollment ‘gateway/bottleneck’ courses, and core undergraduate and graduate courses that have never been taught online. Already approved for funding to enable summer-term delivery are more than 100 online courses. Over $375,000 is being invested.

The Univ of Nebraska Story

Faculty development is a critically important element of initial deployment and continuous improvement of remote learning courses.

Faculty needed to know what software to download and what buttons to push. That was unfortunate by highly necessary step. Moving forward that focus will flip as the future development will begin with the goal of achieving best practices and then focusing on the tools that can be used to accomplish that goal.

The Virginia CC Story

Professional development used to prepare adjunct faculty and graduate assistants to “inherit” previously prepared versions of an online course will be extended to additional faculty new to teaching remotely, assuming there is already a developed online course for them to inherit. Sessions on teaching with lecture capture using Zoom will be required for all summer term remote instruction faculty, with over 200 faculty already signed up. Tom feels that the University will be much better prepared for summer term.

The UCF Story

All faculty teaching remotely are expected to complete the College’s introductory “teaching online” professional development course in the coming weeks. The College has not decided on delivery format for fall term courses.

The St. Petersburg College Story

The Global Campus, which is one of four pillars of WSU’s Academic Outreach and Innovation, is planning to award a certificate to faculty successfully completing ongoing virtual training on topics such as how to better connect with students, and to authentically assess their learning online.

The WA State Univ Story

Faculty new to remote learning must have lots of support and nurturing.

Training and support are reinforced with a campus-wide network of volunteer peer faculty mentors, each an alumnus of a faculty fellows’ program, whose members have completed advanced professional developed on methods and standards for online instruction.

The Wichita State Story

Faculty are being connected with “superusers” in their department who are willing to share their digital content.

The St. Petersburg College Story

The Global Campus production team, which in normal times rolls online courses over from term to term, is helping faculty utilize Global Campus course shells to facilitate online delivery for campus courses.

The WA State Univ Story

IRSC used analytics to inform support priorities available for faculty. While all course sections have a BlackBoard shell, Kendall’s team identified 45 faculty who taught face-to-face classes and who had minimal experience with the LMS. A list of sections, course IDs and faculty members was shared with instructional deans, who encouraged these faculty to participate in professional development to prepare them to deliver their course via remote learning.

Indian River State College Story

Institutions must sustain delivery of services, support and information to students that can no longer obtain these services on campus.

The university supports a “one-stop” student services center for all students, online and on-campus, whose front-line staff addresses 80% of student requests and questions related to student services (admissions, advising, etc.). The remaining 20% are handed off to individual offices for support; these requests are more complicated and take more time to address. The OneStop has proven to be a very valuable resource for students as the University rapidly moved from on-campus to remote learning.

The Wichita State Story

Fortunately, 90% of WSU students had some experience with digital learning, either through online or blended instruction. However, the bigger challenge for students was adjusting to disrupted jobs and lives and doing all their learning at home. They needed structure, and they needed resources. The University responded with an intensive level of personal communication and engagement, food pantries, chrome books to lend, and wi-fi solutions.

The WA State Univ Story

Analytics data identified over 6,000 students who had minimal experience using the LMS. A call center initiative involved tutors and advisors to reach out to these 6,000 students to guide them to resources to support their learning in an online environment. Advisors worked with each individual student to reassure them that they could successfully complete the semester as it shifted to remote instruction.

Indian River State College Story

Communication and information for faculty and students is job-one.

Created an Academic Continuity Planning and Discussion Teams Site, an active hub of communication and sharing, where over 300 faculty and administrators have been collaborating each day.

The Broward College Story

  • The University’s Academic Outreach and Innovation Division had previously developed a comprehensive “Distance Education Tool Kit” to provide instructional continuity during inclement weather. This tool kit has been transformed into an impressive, virtual one-stop repository of resources supporting students and faculty with limited experience with online learning and includes:
  • A Student Guide for Preparing to Complete Courses Remotely.
  • A readiness assessment for faculty to use to identify gaps and training to address these; a schedule of workshops available via Zoom, and companion resources to fill gaps identified in the faculty readiness assessment. https://li.wsu.edu/teaching-tool-boxes/emergency-tool-kit-for-extended-distance-delivery/

The WA State Univ Story

The University frequently updates a comprehensive Covid-19 site loaded with information for students and faculty. https://www.wichita.edu/about/public_information/wsu_topics/topicscovid-19/index.php

The Wichita State Story

Given the Covid closures across the state, many learners may assume that the community colleges are closed or that there is no space for them to enroll. An aggressive social media (other media being considered) campaign is being created to keep and attract students for the summer term.

The Virginia CC Story

Accessibility support for students must be sustained when instruction is delivered remotely.

The University is strongly committed to supporting students with disabilities, and as a result, the use of live video for course lectures is being discouraged. More important, the expectation is that accessibility is built into what instructors deliver, especially when they have students who have registered support needs.

The Wichita State Story

UCF’s provost has funded supplemental captioning and transcription solutions and additional support for the Student Accessibility Services office. An LTI integration has been created within the LMS and placed into specific courses where students have accommodation needs so that faculty can more easily and proactively request accessibility support.

The UCF Story

Pass-Fail.

The default grading system for all converted courses is now pass, fail, or incomplete. A student can request by the last day of instruction to switch to receiving a letter grade. Once that request is made, the student cannot switch back to the pass/fail option.

The Virginia CC Story

Some institutions are not providing pass/fail options because of transferability concerns. The St. Petersburg College Story

Hands-on instruction/labs/clinical instruction is a big, unresolved challenge.

UCF is challenged to provide clinical and physical lab experiences for its students and faculty. The sheer size of the institution and the number of programs requiring lab instruction complicate quick solutions, as do recent enacted austerity measures. The Division of Digital Learning has charged a specific team with researching alternative lab options and they are currently working with several departments to identify and deploy solutions.

The UCF Story

Remote learning at scale is expensive.

Cost containment is a real issue associated with scaling video collaboration and remote proctoring tools. Wichita State’s team uses a tiered approach, first considering less expensive solutions, such as university faculty proctoring their exams. The University does not want to make education more expensive for existing students already struggling financially.

The Wichita State Story

The University has stepped up to absorb the expense of scaling Proctorio from Global Campus to University-wide use to support assessment and the integrity of student work. This expense is not being passed on to students, including Global Campus students who were previously paying for service.

The WA State Univ Story

  • The University must absorb proctoring expenses, as students cannot be charged a fee to maintain academic integrity without advanced notification during enrollment. For an institution of UCF’s size, the costs associated with enterprise-level remote proctor solutions are significant.
  • Maintaining and adding qualitative dimensions to remote learning requires finding funding at a time colleges and universities are reducing budgets in preparation for declines in enrollment paired with state funding cuts.

The UCF Story

Silver linings.

Today’s remote learning classes may become tomorrow’s online courses, adding more learning options to our online course portfolio.

The Wichita State Story

The St. Petersburg College Story

Indian River State College Story

Recent experiences have demystified the instructional technology tools that support remote learning/online learning for faculty, who would have never attempted these delivery methods. “We have introduced so many faculty members to teaching with technology, and now we can build upon this accomplishment.” The Broward College Story
Faculty members who have resisted the option of adopting standard, high quality online courses are now embracing this option. And as faculty members have positive first experiences in remote learning, SPC expects that faculty will choose to adopt more online tools and eventually move from live online with synchronous lectures to asynchronous online learning. The St. Petersburg College Story

 

 

russ adkins author photo
Russ Adkins
CEO
Russ Adkins, Inc. (Higher Education Consultant)

 

 


WCET Resources on COVID-19

This is a highly dynamic situation and WCET will continue to update this post as needed. As always, we recommend that you directly contact your accreditor for specific guidance. WCET will continue to provide resources and updates related to COVID-19. Please see the WCET COVID-19 webpage which lists a number of curated resources for instruction, assessment, student services, regulatory policy, technology/infrastructure, and institutional emergency response planning.


 

CC Logo
Image credits:

Telephone Photo by Pavan Trikutam on Unsplash
Categories
Practice

Considering the Future, Now! 

I don’t know about you, but the last few weeks (months?) have felt surreal. Not only on a professional level, but on a personal one as well. That uncanny feeling I have about ‘these times’ has continued as our local and state leaders and our federal governments are discussing what it will take to start moving toward normal (or, at least, a new normal).

What does the future hold for higher education? We’ve been discussing “What’s Next” in our posts here on Frontiers. Today we are joined by two estimable leaders in our field, Jory Hadsell and Pat James, to discuss California Community College’s responses to the COVID-19 crisis, and how the foundation of the state’s system helped ensure their response was as successful as possible. In addition, Jory and Pat offer some advice on instructional continuity and crisis planning.

They have included some amazing tips and suggestions in today’s post. We italicized these tips to call attention to them.

Enjoy the read and stay healthy!

Lindsey Downs, WCET


As we all move toward summer and wonder what the future holds for our normal progress of scheduling classes and serving students, are we taking the time to consider not only the next steps but next coordinated movements? This post, written jointly by the former and current executive directors of the California Virtual Campus – Online Education Initiative (OEI), who are also WCET contributors, will share how the foundations had already been built for its state system of 115 community colleges at the time of the crisis. We will focus primarily on three areas:

  • Research
  • Professional Development
  • Permanent Planning

We will highlight how a few individual colleges approached the challenges, the widespread sharing that exists across the system, and some ideas for collectively moving forward through summer, fall, and beyond. We hope to stimulate some ideas about what you can do now to influence the future success of your students and to plan for tomorrow’s emergency.

California Community Colleges Response to COVID-19

On March 30, the Public Policy Institute of California posted the following on their blog:

California’s community colleges can offer others a lesson in effective practices for distance education. These schools have been at the forefront of remote learning for more than four decades, from correspondence courses in the early days to instructional television and video cassettes in the 1980s. In the early 2000s, community colleges began to offer internet-based online courses.shape of California state in teal

The availability and popularity of distance courses have exploded with the internet, as have course success rates. The share of enrolled students completing and passing a course has skyrocketed, narrowing the gap in success between online and in-person courses substantially…

…Policies around closing the success gap were intentional, with the Community College Chancellor’s Office leading efforts to improve online courses through the Online Education Initiative and the California Virtual Campus. Resources available to administrators and faculty include modules on effective course design, remote tutoring, student services, and even proctoring of exams (links take you to the CVC-OEI ecosystem portal).

All 72 independent Community College Districts started transitioning their on-campus classes in mid-March and were all shifted to remote learning by April 6th. They took from 2 days to 3 weeks (3 including spring break) to resume with almost all of their face-to-face classes converted to a distance format.

A couple of days ago, one of the distance education coordinators asked us to “imagine what it would have been like now without a common LMS and shared ecosystem of resources.” The sharing of resources and ideas across our system in the last month has been phenomenal and we will share links to resources throughout and at the end of this article. We wanted to quickly reflect on what made the current mobilization possible.

Background

At the beginning of the OEI, we were a small team of under ten people, and we decided to be wholly collaborative in our planning and decision-making. In creating something new, we were all fortunate to have come from working in colleges and charting a new course. We had to learn to approach this work differently. We started by not separating ourselves into the traditional college “divisions” for decision-making and resourcing. Instead, all ideas were brought to the table, assessed, and prioritized with the big picture in mind. One of the first things we did as a team was to watch a TED Talks episode delivered by Linda Hill entitled, “How to Manage for Collective Creativity.”

The philosophy of collaboration and full transparency—along with a foundation of doing what is best for students as a guiding principle—allowed us to help colleges coalesce and cooperate in new ways. It set us on the path to shared decision-making from the adoption of a quality course design rubric through the selection of a common learning management system, and the development of an online support ecosystem that all colleges could adopt from a central source (Tip: Enabling colleges to purchase compliantly without going through individual RFP processes turned out to be quite a helpful approach). This system-wide foundation was undeniably the springboard needed as the state recently transitioned courses to remote offerings.

As the initiative developed in that first year, we embraced input from administrators, staff members, and faculty across the system. Two groups that were instrumental in the collaborations were the distance educators’ association (CCCDECO), and the statewide academic senate (ASCCC). We practiced systems thinking when we approached any problem from disparate business processes to local curriculum considerations.

Our advice is to practice systems thinking if you’re looking to transition from the initial reactions to this crisis to quality online education that can be scaled to support a long-term strategy. Engage everyone in the process of researching and discussing online learning, which may have existed as a separate or isolated department of your college before February 2020. 

We provided a few excerpts from Peter Senge’s book, “The Fifth Discipline,” on the benefits of systems thinking:

Systems thinking is a … framework for seeing interrelationships rather than things, for seeing patterns of change rather than static “snapshots” (pg 68).
….most of the time, things do not turn out as we expect. But the potential value of unexpected developments is rarely tapped. Instead, when things turn out contrary to our expectations, we go immediately into problem-solving mode and react, or just try harder— without taking the time to see whether this unexpected development is telling us something important about our assumptions (pg 288).

As we move from a temporary situation as an initial reaction to COVID-19 to the possibility of an extended time of campus closures—what will faculty, staff, and administrators in full collaboration be able to learn together?

We offer some ideas about research to inform planning, resources for current and ongoing professional development, and ideas about developing permanent plans for the future.

Don’t Fly Blind: Start Tracking Now, You’ll Need It Later!

As educators, we are always focused on learning both from our own experience and from the experience of others. Ultimately, we should always focus on every opportunity to learn, and this crisis is like every experience, an opportunity to grow in knowledge. Right now, many of us are deep into getting to the next destination without a clear roadmap. Once we have traveled somewhere, we have the knowledge of how we got there, and we can make the road smoother for the next time we have to traverse it.

If we have learned nothing else in California, it is that the fires will not cease and the earthquakes will come again. The massive amount of planning effort that goes on after a devastating event informs the next response, so institutions do not react, but respond based on an informed plan. To develop a strong plan—reviewing the reactionary path you had to take is a critical step.

What are your institutional researchers doing right now to ensure that you will have what you need to inform a plan for both the immediate and long-term future? a clockEstablish whatever baseline data you can now. Don’t wait too long to establish some models for your research efforts or you may have trouble disaggregating the information later.

Here are some of our broad suggestions:

  • Track your steps carefully from the start of this crisis (event) and ongoing. Include a baseline of what staff you had who were able to do the instructional design and support work, who was involved in the decision-making process, and the logistics of when and how you mobilized a transition from on-campus to online classes. Keep track of how you rolled out your transition and what steps you continued to take over time.
  • Monitor and track the questions you are fielding from your help desk or other resource providers (Disabled Students Program, distance education staff, professional development facilitators, etc.). These questions will help you identify any gaps you had in your preparation and rollout efforts. Frequently asked questions are great for letting you know what information you didn’t initially provide and making sure that information is readily available as you move forward.
  • Determine “the numbers” (some examples):
    • Class adaptation: Assess what existed in your schedule before the transition in all modalities and what was formally included in your online learning program after. Which courses would have been delivered on campus if they could have been? This information may be invaluable in letting you know how to effectively grow your regular online program.
    • Faculty: Determine both the number and identity of those who had training prior to the transition, and who received just-in-time training during the event, and what comprised professional development.
    • Students: How many students received some kind of orientation prior to, and during the event? Did you lose students during the transition?
    • Students: How many of your students have never taken online classes before?  This information can help you decide what resources you need to help students succeed (i.e. orientation, technology, and connectivity).

Dr. Jodie Steeley, the distance education director at Fresno City College, told us that at the onset of the on-ground transition at her college, they looked for resources (vendor-based solutions and professional development courses) that had built-in analytics. Their student orientation was created by Instructure and was available for download from the Canvas Commons. They chose a scalable basic student orientation to Canvas course, Passport, which provided two things that Jodie and her small team were seeking—good information for students and accurate analytics. The ability for students to self-enroll in the orientation course also allowed the college to track not only how many, but which students participated in the orientation effort.

The Fresno City College team drew on their experience of having to be incredibly efficient and we can all learn from them. As you create plans in the light of the current events, share your ideas and keep reviewing the ideas of others. The roads we travel may be different. We may be a small university, a medium-sized community college, or a large state university system, but the more we involve ourselves in systems thinking, the more we learn and build an educated citizenry.

What are you doing to ensure that you will have the data you need to plan for your future work? Don’t wait too long to establish some models for your research efforts or you may have trouble disaggregating information later.

Professional Development Changing Phases…

Quick Start PD for an Emergency Online Migration

There are many ideas being published right now about what teachers who are new to offering classes from a distance need to know. In conversations with various college online leaders, we found that they were sharing actual “quick start” courses with each other. The resources they were using were often from Canvas Commons, which are adaptable to any system as they provide the basics on how to use functions of the LMS.

This includes:

  • Announcements
  • Calendaring
  • Syllabi
  • Coursework posting and collection (e.g., essays and assignments)
  • Quiz and proctoring functionality
  • Posting general assignment and information pages

See the resources located in this section of the CVC-OEI resource site. Quick-start efforts also included the use of Zoom. Many of our faculty are meeting their classes synchronously while others are choosing to take a more traditional, asynchronous online course path, and still others are doing both. There are still questions about what the best approach is, and what makes the decision effective is based on the answers to them.

  • What training does the instructor enable them to do? Are they adept at the use of web conferencing tools, or are they really comfortable with the available tools and resources of your LMS?
  • What is the subject matter of the course? Some courses rely heavily on demonstrations that may not be readily available in a digital format, or they can’t be verified in a completely online environment without comprehensive faculty training and access to the appropriate tools. Welding and firefighting come to mind.
  • How much time do faculty members have to prepare?
  • How prepared are the students to learn in an asynchronous environment?

Training Format

Some of our colleges started by offering on-ground training for faculty during a gap in the time of the initial closure and the reopening of classes remotely. They also offered a combination of self-paced training opportunities in the LMS and web seminar training using Zoom. The differences in the time-span of the closure and the use of spring break weeks, compared to success rates, will be interesting to analyze in the wake of this crisis.

Ongoing Professional Development and Support

Think in terms of offering professional development in phases. As much as possible, don’t stop the good work of improving the quality of established online classes. Dual tracks are needed to address both ends of the online teaching continuum. It’s time to consider what might be next in providing professional development for faculty. What would help them grow their ability to improve student engagement and effective practice in their remote teaching that could develop into high-quality online courses? Also, what support do your seasoned online instructors need at this time, and is it possible that they could share their course content with the folks just getting into remote teaching? Don’t forget that many online instructors also teach on-ground courses and need time and support to both continue what they were doing, and their remote efforts as well.

Through interviews with a variety of our California distance education coordinators, we developed a shortlist of additional training “segments” that could be released to faculty as they become able to adopt them into their remote practice. These ideas deal with technical training and pedagogical training. We have also seen colleges add social and emotional elements to their training. By the way, the OEI has developed an online wellness center that can be customized for use by the individual colleges.

Beyond the Quick-Start

  1. Self-paced: Creation of accessible documents. The CVC-OEI has several self-paced training options available via its professional development program @ONE.
  2. Creating communication opportunities for students:
    • What is regular and substantive interaction?
    • What makes for an effective discussion?
    • Creating opportunities for community building within a class.
  3. Creating assessments that are aligned with course objectives and outcomes:
    • A quick overview of Backward Design strategies or other alignment strategies.
    • Sample assessments using an LMS.
    • Providing instructor feedback.
  4. Multiple media presentation activities, including:
    • Quick Video Announcements (with captioning resources)
    • Create a quick video to introduce themselves for their first effort. We suggest not adding captioning to the first one. This should be low stakes just to get their feet wet.
    • Then have them create a 2 minute or less instructional video and add in your captioning resources (e.g., Youtube edited captions or other services you may have retained).
  5. How to find OER resources.
  6. Practicing “Copyright” Compliance, including:
    • Citations.
    • Creative Commons.
    • The Teach Act.
    • Fair Use policies.

The use of the group tools in your LMS might be another item to add to the list, but you get the idea. Develop these quick additional professional development tools as you can. You likely have already developed content within a certification course for online teachers that you can adapt to short, just-in-time (JIT) solutions. An open course from Modesto Community College has some really great examples of very quick just-in-time videos that will give you an idea of what type of video would work as JIT training. Then develop them into a menu that your faculty can select. As you look at the @ONE website—which includes the courses page and the Pocket PD and Quick Byte pages—you can see how these professional development opportunities have been added over time. Everything developed by @ONE is licensed with Creative Commons, and you can adopt and adapt the courses for your own use.

Other Resources for a Phased Approach

Ongoing Planning

Lastly, we wanted to encourage you to start a planning effort that uses systems thinking principles to create a solid but living plan for the “next time” you are faced with the need for instructional continuity implementation. Whenever you call upon faculty and staff to participate in a planning effort like the one we are encouraging, be certain that they are not so crazy busy that they couldn’t possibly participate at this moment. Yes, make a plan to plan.a woman drawing a diagram

Start collecting information as we proposed earlier. Have someone who is an effective planner on your staff develop a list of items you may need in the short term, and ultimately, a permanent plan for instructional continuity. What will it cover? Will it be included in an overall distance education plan? Does it cover the following situations for both short- and long-term periods? What college policies should already be in place?

College closure scenarios to plan for:

  • Interruption of online education but not on-campus classes.
  • Interruption of on-campus instruction but not online education classes.
  • College closure when the college is functional and the community is not—as in the COVID-19 situation and Northern California Fires.
  • College closures due to actual facility loss (as in earthquake, fire, floods, etc.).
  • Campus shut down due active shooter or another environmental safety issue.

In 2018, the OEI started a disaster plan initiative for “instructional continuity.” Although we didn’t use the term then, when we were faced with college closures due to the Northern California fires.

Last year, we engaged with our partners at American Public University System to develop disaster planning strategies for the colleges that cover a wide range of scenarios. We hope to continue that work via yearly Online Teaching Conference presentations and direct work with APUS’s articulation partner colleges. APUS provides programs for students in disaster planning that are online, and it would benefit all of us to have some staff and students take advantage of those programs! In response to the pandemic, the institution recently launched Momentum 2020. It will enable students, who experienced a disruption in their learning, to continue their education by taking up to two undergraduate courses using a 50 percent tuition grant for each course started in May through August 2020.

Cynthia Dewar from San Francisco City College told us that they started creating an instructional disaster plan back in 2018 and had many of the following steps in place when their college was faced with transitioning their courses. Those actions were instrumental in getting them off to a good start. The items below were meant to happen prior to any emergency need.

  • Clear identification of the process.
  • Criteria for Emergency Status that allow for an emergency transition to happen.
  • The college LMS administrators already can work from anywhere, and can post alert information and instructions, and also deploy surveys.
    • Provided with sample surveys to locate faculty, staff, and students that LMS administrators can have ready to go to find out who is available to teach, help, and attend.
    • Provided with sample alert messages.
    • Provided with timelines, lines of communication, and support resources in advance.
    • A plan for having all staff, faculty, and students prepared.
  • Everyone has an LMS account. For us, there was no additional LMS cost as our system license is for unlimited use.
  • Everyone receives instructions on how to set up their profiles and notifications and where to go to get information in an emergency (i.e., their dashboard).
  • For faculty and support staff:
    • A clear template for emergency use of the LMS for instruction (could live in every course as an unpublished unit(s)/module(s) ready for use at any time).
    • All faculty have access to online tutorials (self-paced) on how to use the template and how to remain in compliance with regulations while doing so. They are required to go through the tutorials preemptively.
  • Added in Feb. 2020: Everyone has a Zoom account and instructions for effective use.

The distance education general planning guide we developed back in 2018 also included training for administration about distance education so that there is a common understanding of what it takes to develop a comprehensive DE Program. The disaster planning component additionally included what to do when an instructor became unavailable during a term (due to death, illness, or separation of employment).

Some general suggestions from our coordinators were to create small teams consisting of 1 instructional designer, 1 seasoned online instructor, and 3 to 5 new teachers who are working on their emergency course migrations (ECM). These teams can meet as needed and generally assist the ECM teachers.

Courses that are already completely online can be shared with ECM teachers instructing similar courses, or within disciplines, to provide ideas and content as ECM teachers ramp up through summer and fall. The concept we heard the most was to share everything. If intellectual property rights become an obstacle, address that with funding if you have it, or appeal to the emergency situation our students are in. Always do what is best for students.

We hope you weather this storm well and emerge stronger and better able to respond to events that will come your way in the future. We have an opportunity to apply the lessons we are learning now to strengthen our institutions for years to come. Set your sights on comprehensive disaster planning and don’t leave the instructional component as an afterthought.

jory
Jory Hadsell,
Executive Director of CVC-OEI,
WCET Steering Committee member

 

pat
Pat James,
Educational Partnerships Manager, American Public University,
former Executive Director of the CVC-OEI,
Former chair of the WCET Executive Council.


Both Jory and Pat were original staff hired to launch the Online Education Initiative in 2014, now the California Virtual Campus – Online Education Initiative.
The CVC-OEI Website provides a link to all of the California Community College resources.
American Public University is a fully online university and has educational partnerships with colleges in the CCC system.


WCET Resources on COVID-19

This is a highly dynamic situation and WCET will continue to update this post as needed. As always, we recommend that you directly contact your accreditor for specific guidance. WCET will continue to provide resources and updates related to COVID-19. Please see the WCET COVID-19 webpage which lists a number of curated resources for instruction, assessment, student services, regulatory policy, technology/infrastructure, and institutional emergency response planning.
__

CC Logo


Image Credits:
CA Image by Gordon Johnson from Pixabay 
Diagram Photo by Kelly Sikkema on Unsplash
Laptop Photo by Christin Hume on Unsplash

Clock Photo by Tristan Colangelo on Unsplash

Categories
Practice

Open in a Time of Crisis

As an ongoing part of WCET’s efforts to help faculty and staff respond to the pandemic, today Dr. Tanya Spilovoy, our resident Open Educational Resources (OER) expert, takes a look at the role openness and OER can play as institutions move away from rushing to deliver remote instruction to more deliberately designed online courses for the summer term and beyond.

As Tanya discusses, OER can play a critical role in making education more affordable for students in these increasingly difficult economic times. Just as importantly, though, she discusses how the philosophy of openness can help build collaborations that will result in everything from more educational opportunities for students to better teaching resources to perhaps even a vaccine for the novel coronavirus.

WCET is glad we can provide you with information that can both help you right now as well as begin to think about what is next for higher education.  

Van Davis, WCET


We’re already talking about this time like other collectively devastating events in history (aka pre and post 9/11). We remember the joys of “Pre-Coronavirus,” and while we’re figuring out our strange existence in “Coronavirus,” everyone is wondering “What’s next?” What will “Post Coronavirus” look like?

A lot of us are asking how we can learn from this situation to make the future better. These are hard questions to answer while folks are dealing with so many personal, professional, and economic changes. But I believe that there is opportunity in chaos. If we pay attention to positive solutions, there is hope for a better future. The chaos and transition during the past few weeks have been difficult, but during that time, our people have demonstrated a resounding hope for a better, more open future.

How Open is Helping

With every depressing announcement that something we cherish has closed (schools, sports, churches, gyms, etc.), I was heartened (but not surprised) to see the swift, helpful response from everyone in the Open community. When I asked #OER Twitter to share the Open Community is doing to help, the answers were amazing. As a quick reminder, Open Educational Resources (OER) are teaching, learning and research materials in any medium – digital or otherwise – that reside in the public domain or have been released under an open license that permits no-cost access, use, adaptation and redistribution by others with no or limited restrictions” (The William and Flora Hewlett Foundation).

This is a partial list of what the Open Community is doing to help:

Going Open

an open doorAnd then, the Open Community “opened,” and it wasn’t merely an echo chamber of the usual voices anymore.

Suddenly, EVERYONE was going Open.

COVID-19, although horrible, has created an environment of unprecedented sharing and openness throughout the world. While many of the activities we’ve witnessed don’t fit the traditional parameters of open—mainly, open licensing—they clearly demonstrate openness in its purest forms of inclusion, access, social justice, sharing, and making the world a better place.

  • The arts community has generously provided free Facebook concerts, comedy routines, musicals, and tours of art collections.
  • Dolly Parton is reading bedtime stories; Keith Urban, Elton John, Lady Gaga, and Lizzo sang to quarantined viewers from their separate living rooms.
  • Sir. Patrick Stewart is performing a sonnet a day.
  • Exercise instructors are posting videos for folks to do free at-home workouts.
  • Some tech vendors have made their resources and products free for a limited time to the public.
  • People are filling little food pantries, donating plasma, & sewing masks for frontline workers.

Open, in its many forms (open education, open resources, open science, open publishing, open computing), is helping students, faculty, institutions, and researchers reduce costs and increase access (with same or better learning outcomes). It also enables scientists to work together on vaccines and medical solutions. Open is a making a positive difference during the COVID-19 crisis. You might be wondering, “How can we expand the momentum of all this Openness post-Coronavirus?”

Benefit to Institutions, Faculty and Students

OER saves money.

For states, systems, and institutional leaders worried about finances due to the pandemic’s economic downturn, Open Educational Resources are a solution. In February 2020, Achieving the Dream released OER at Scale: the Academic and Economic Outcomes of Achieving the Dream’s OER Degree Initiative.” The study “found that students enrolled in OER courses earned more credits than non-participating peers and that the effort was cost-effective not just for students but for institutions. Students at the participating colleges saved $10.7 million on the cost of learning materials. As courses became established, institutions were in position to recover their costs or even, in some instances, generate income from the effort as more students signed up for the OER courses.” States, systems, and institutions boast huge return on investment when they focus even small dollar amounts in open education.

OER = Equitable Access.

In the last few weeks, we’ve witnessed the whirlwind transition from traditional to “remote instruction.” Many teachers, P-20, frantically searched for appropriate learning materials to integrate with technology. The transition was smooth for students and faculty already using OER instead of publisher materials. There are entire courses, textbooks, supplemental materials, simulations, telescopes, etc. that are available to anyone to use. Faculty have the freedom to use and adapt OER for their courses. It’s important to mention that publishers temporarily lifting a paywall during a crisis isn’t OER, and it certainly isn’t a long-term solution; once the grace period is over the paywall will be reinstated. To ensure students have equitable, open access to learning materials, we’ll need to focus on long-term efforts on educational content that meets the definition of OER.

Dive into the Wave of Openness

While this crisis has presented many hurdles to overcome for higher education–such as student food and housing crises, unequal access to WIFI, probable state education funding cuts, and looming uncertainty regarding the effects of COVID-19 will have on Fall 2020’s enrollment numbers and our ability to be on campus. a person diving into water My hope is that the education community will continue to embrace and expand Open. The Department of Education recently released the Open Textbook Pilot call for public comments in the federal register. The summary states “We intend this action to further develop and identify programs and practices that improve instruction and student learning outcomes, as well as increase access, affordability, and completion rates of students seeking postsecondary education degrees or other recognized credentials as a result of the development, enhancement, and use of open textbooks (as defined in this notice).”

I encourage each of you to dive into the wave of openness. There is something for everyone. Provide comments to the Department of Education by April 30th. While we all can’t do everything, each of us has the opportunity to spread more hope, joy, inclusion, and openness in the world. If you’re interested in finding openly-licensed resources, explore the links I’ve provided; there are endless open pedagogy and open educational resources available for your fall courses and programs. If you’re a leader looking for ways to help your institution or state during the Coronavirus crisis, there are excellent examples of Open Policy at the institution, system, and state level that will reduce cost and increase access for students. If you’re not sure where to start, you can contact me; I’m always happy to help. This is everyone’s opportunity to weigh in on what we’d like to see in the hopefully-soon post-Coronavirus era.

 

Tanya Spilovoy

Tanya Spilovoy
Director, Open Policy, WCET
@TanyaSpilovoy  tspilovoy@wiche.edu

 

 

Tanya Spilovoy, Ed. D., is the Director, Open Policy at WCET where she focuses on the policy, practice, and implementation of Open Educational Resources in states, systems, and higher education institutions. She is also the co-creator and instructor for the SPARC Open Education Leadership Program. Previously, she served as the Director of Distance Education and State Authorization at the North Dakota University System and has taught college English and English as a second language in K-12 and abroad. Spilovoy received her B.A. in English from Union College, a M.A. in Education from Hamline University, and a Doctorate in Higher Education Leadership and Organizational Change from Benedictine University.


CC Logo


Image Credits:

Diving Photo by Archaique Chang on Unsplash
Open Door Photo by Matthew T Rader on Unsplash
Learn about WCET Creative Commons 4.0 License